Pictures from yesterday's war protest. Frank Cordaro is being held in a private jail in Missouri for protesting the war by sitting-in at Senator Grassley's Des Moines Office.
Saturday, October 13
Free Frank Cordaro
Pictures from yesterday's war protest. Frank Cordaro is being held in a private jail in Missouri for protesting the war by sitting-in at Senator Grassley's Des Moines Office.
Friday, October 12
Nobel Oblige
With the news of Al Gore sharing the Nobel Peace Prize with the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, you have got to know that there is huge political capital to be expended, and the White House wasted no time. Asked if the Nobel win would pressure the Bush administration to adopt an approach ala Gore to tackle climate change, spokesperson Tony Fratto flatly replied: "No." He said that the next step "really the most difficult step, is implementing climate change strategies that are effective and practical." He said such strategies should "allow for continued economic development and for contries to do the work that they need to do to lift people out of poverty. And that's a challenging taskIs this just another wily manuever to get Al Gore to run for the presidency-- another, "Anybody but Hillary" tactic? No, it is the strident stance of a President who has no ability to create a positive lasting legacy (negative, yes--he's got his war and his Supreme Court).
I am sure the pull to bring in Uber-Rock Star Gore is there and I am sure that Gore would be ecstatic to see his commitment to reduced carbon dioxide emissions realized, but as long as all of the Democratic frontrunners are singing his tune, why should he join the fray?
The only person from Tennessee who is silly enough to jump in this mess has been the Republican, Fred Thompson--and he's definitely no Al Gore.
One thing that is for sure, if the Democrats get to make a climate change at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., you know its because they get the Gore-y details.
All Politics are Local
A lot of people want to know more about the local election and where to get more information about the candidates and their positions. Professor David Redlawsk, all around good guy and former FAIR! leader, has a nice link to all things Iowa City election-oriented. Go here.
As it stands, there are 4 candidates for 2 at-large seats on the council, current mayor Ross Wilburn (from District A) and mayor pro tem Regenia Bailey (from District C) are running unopposed.
Of course, you always have the option to write-in a candidate if you prefer.
The two referendum items to be voted on are:
Public Measure C (Bar admission age)
Whereas, it is in the public interest to provide, unless otherwise exempted by law or ordinance, that a person shall have attained legal age (currently 21 years of age or more) to lawfully be on the premises between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to closing of any Iowa City establishment holding a liquor control license, a wine or beer permit, that authorizes on premises consumption.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that Article 4, Chapter 5, Section 8 of the City Code of Iowa City – entitled Persons Under 19 Years of Age in Licensed or Permitted Establishments – shall be modified to replace “nineteen (19) years of age” wherever and however it appears within such Section 8 with “the legal age”.
More information:
http://www.bloc21.com/
http://www.voteyes21.org/
Public Measure D (Police Citizen Review Board)
That Article V (Boards, Commissions and Committees), Subsection 5.01 (Establishment) of the Home Rule Charter of Iowa City, Iowa be amended by adding the following underlined words:
With the exception of the Police Citizens Review Board, the Council may establish Boards in addition to those required by State law and shall specify the title, duties, length of term, qualifications of members and other appropriate matters. The Council may reduce or increase a Board’s duties, transfer duties from one Board to another or dissolve any Board, except as otherwise provided by State law or this Charter.
A. There shall be a permanent Police Citizens Review Board, which shall have vested in it the following minimum powers:
1. To hold at least one community forum each year for the purpose of hearing citizens’ views on the policies, practices, and procedures of the Iowa City Police Department, and to make recommendations regarding such policies, practices, and procedures to the City Council.
2. To investigate citizen claims of misconduct by sworn police officers and to issue independent reports of its findings to the City Council; and
3. The authority to subpoena witnesses.
More information:
http://www.betterpcrb.com/
Early voting for the November 6th election is already underway at the Johnson County Admin Building and satelite locations schedule is here.
REMEMBER, same day voter registration does not happen until 1/2008. The last day to register to vote for this election is October 26th at 5 pm.
I will be adding my thoughts on the local election and referendum ballot items in the next couple of weeks.
As it stands, there are 4 candidates for 2 at-large seats on the council, current mayor Ross Wilburn (from District A) and mayor pro tem Regenia Bailey (from District C) are running unopposed.
Of course, you always have the option to write-in a candidate if you prefer.
The two referendum items to be voted on are:
Public Measure C (Bar admission age)
Whereas, it is in the public interest to provide, unless otherwise exempted by law or ordinance, that a person shall have attained legal age (currently 21 years of age or more) to lawfully be on the premises between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to closing of any Iowa City establishment holding a liquor control license, a wine or beer permit, that authorizes on premises consumption.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that Article 4, Chapter 5, Section 8 of the City Code of Iowa City – entitled Persons Under 19 Years of Age in Licensed or Permitted Establishments – shall be modified to replace “nineteen (19) years of age” wherever and however it appears within such Section 8 with “the legal age”.
More information:
http://www.bloc21.com/
http://www.voteyes21.org/
Public Measure D (Police Citizen Review Board)
That Article V (Boards, Commissions and Committees), Subsection 5.01 (Establishment) of the Home Rule Charter of Iowa City, Iowa be amended by adding the following underlined words:
With the exception of the Police Citizens Review Board, the Council may establish Boards in addition to those required by State law and shall specify the title, duties, length of term, qualifications of members and other appropriate matters. The Council may reduce or increase a Board’s duties, transfer duties from one Board to another or dissolve any Board, except as otherwise provided by State law or this Charter.
A. There shall be a permanent Police Citizens Review Board, which shall have vested in it the following minimum powers:
1. To hold at least one community forum each year for the purpose of hearing citizens’ views on the policies, practices, and procedures of the Iowa City Police Department, and to make recommendations regarding such policies, practices, and procedures to the City Council.
2. To investigate citizen claims of misconduct by sworn police officers and to issue independent reports of its findings to the City Council; and
3. The authority to subpoena witnesses.
More information:
http://www.betterpcrb.com/
Early voting for the November 6th election is already underway at the Johnson County Admin Building and satelite locations schedule is here.
REMEMBER, same day voter registration does not happen until 1/2008. The last day to register to vote for this election is October 26th at 5 pm.
I will be adding my thoughts on the local election and referendum ballot items in the next couple of weeks.
Surrogate Forum in Cedar Rapids
The members of Women for Peace Iowa would like to announce the following event:
Candidates' Forum sponsored by Women for Peace Iowa
Sunday, October 14
2-4 p.m.
Beems Auditorium
Cedar Rapids Public Library
Representatives of the Democratic presidential candidates will answer questions for the public at an open forum on Sunday, October 14, 2-4 p.m., at Beems
auditorium Cedar Rapids Public Library, First Street SE.
Confirmed speakers include Rep. Elesha Gayman for Barack O'Bama, Rep. Art Staed for John
Edwards, Rep. Lisa Heddens for Joe Biden, and attorney Elizabeth Frawley Bagley for Hillary Clinton.
Issues will include election reform, American oil dependence, ending the Iraq War, American influence in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, and restoring American jobs and fair trade policy. Sponsored by Women for Peace Iowa, 364-4709.
Candidates' Forum sponsored by Women for Peace Iowa
Sunday, October 14
2-4 p.m.
Beems Auditorium
Cedar Rapids Public Library
Representatives of the Democratic presidential candidates will answer questions for the public at an open forum on Sunday, October 14, 2-4 p.m., at Beems
auditorium Cedar Rapids Public Library, First Street SE.
Confirmed speakers include Rep. Elesha Gayman for Barack O'Bama, Rep. Art Staed for John
Edwards, Rep. Lisa Heddens for Joe Biden, and attorney Elizabeth Frawley Bagley for Hillary Clinton.
Issues will include election reform, American oil dependence, ending the Iraq War, American influence in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, and restoring American jobs and fair trade policy. Sponsored by Women for Peace Iowa, 364-4709.
Thursday, October 11
Writer, Anti-Nuke Activist, Nobel Prize Winning Doris Lessing: "I Couldn't Care Less"
I love honest people and Doris Lessing is certainly up on the list.
The AP and Yahoo
Doris Lessing pulled up in a black cab where a media horde was waiting Thursday in front of her leafy north London home. Reporters opened the door and told her she had won the Nobel Prize for literature, to which she responded: "Oh Christ ... I couldn't care less."
Lessing later said she thought the cameras were there to film a television program. Vegetables peeked out from blue plastic bags she carried out of the cab.
"This has been going on for 30 years," she said, as reporters helped her with the bags.
"I've won all the prizes in Europe, every bloody one, so I'm delighted to win them all, the whole lot, OK?" Lessing said, making her way through the crowd. "It's a royal flush."
"I'm sure you'd like some uplifting remarks," she added with a smile.
Lessing, who turns 88 this month, is the oldest winner of the literature prize. Although she is widely celebrated for "The Golden Notebook" and other works, she has received little attention in recent years and has been criticized as strident and eccentric.
Asked repeatedly if she was excited about the award, she held court from her doorstep and noted she had been in the running for the Nobel for decades.
"I can't say I'm overwhelmed with surprise," Lessing said. "I'm 88 years old and they can't give the Nobel to someone who's dead, so I think they were probably thinking they'd probably better give it to me now before I've popped off."
The AP and Yahoo
Doris Lessing pulled up in a black cab where a media horde was waiting Thursday in front of her leafy north London home. Reporters opened the door and told her she had won the Nobel Prize for literature, to which she responded: "Oh Christ ... I couldn't care less."
Lessing later said she thought the cameras were there to film a television program. Vegetables peeked out from blue plastic bags she carried out of the cab.
"This has been going on for 30 years," she said, as reporters helped her with the bags.
"I've won all the prizes in Europe, every bloody one, so I'm delighted to win them all, the whole lot, OK?" Lessing said, making her way through the crowd. "It's a royal flush."
"I'm sure you'd like some uplifting remarks," she added with a smile.
Lessing, who turns 88 this month, is the oldest winner of the literature prize. Although she is widely celebrated for "The Golden Notebook" and other works, she has received little attention in recent years and has been criticized as strident and eccentric.
Asked repeatedly if she was excited about the award, she held court from her doorstep and noted she had been in the running for the Nobel for decades.
"I can't say I'm overwhelmed with surprise," Lessing said. "I'm 88 years old and they can't give the Nobel to someone who's dead, so I think they were probably thinking they'd probably better give it to me now before I've popped off."
Free Frank Cordaro
Friends,
Anti-War Hero Fr. Frank Cordaro was arrested for sitting in at Senator Grassley's office in Des Moines and sentenced to 30 days at a corporately-owned jail in Missouri. It is up to each of us to raise our voices to protest his incarceration and the war. In a very real sense, Frank is being made an example of, and for that reason alone, we must not be silenced. A way we can show our solidarity with Frank is to continue to protest the war and bring a "Free Frank Cordaro" signs with you to hold up and/or pass out.We meet at 5:15 on Clinton/Washington St. tomorrow (Friday).
Frank is a P.O.W., we must be his voice.
PS you can click on the photo above to make your own Free Frank sign.
Peace,
Garry
Wednesday, October 10
Four in Ten Think that the US Tortures POWs
Apparently torture is becoming the new "American Pastime"...are we really such a nation of sick puppies or do people really think that torture can be justified?
Forty-two percent (42%) of American voters believe that the United States tortures prisoners captured in the War on Terror. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 30% disagree and say the U.S. does not torture prisoners while 28% are not sure. Last Friday, President Bush said that the United States "does not torture people."
However, news reports have suggested that the Administration has approved aggressive forms of interrogation that many might consider torture. Congress has passed, and President Bush has signed, a federal ban on the use of torture.
While a plurality believes the U.S. does torture terrorist prisoners, 66% believe that the United States treats prisoners of war better than most other nations. Just 16% disagree on this point. In fact, the Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 78% of voters believe that the terrorists torture U.S. soldiers. Only 4% disagree on this point.
Fifty-three percent (53%) say that the U.S. should not torture prisoners while 27% believe it should. Forty-one percent (41%) believe torture helps gain valuable information that protects U.S. soldiers while 35% say it does not. In his remarks last week, the President stated that interrogation techniques have provided valuable information that have helped protect the American people.
Forty-two percent (42%) of American voters believe that the United States tortures prisoners captured in the War on Terror. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 30% disagree and say the U.S. does not torture prisoners while 28% are not sure. Last Friday, President Bush said that the United States "does not torture people."
However, news reports have suggested that the Administration has approved aggressive forms of interrogation that many might consider torture. Congress has passed, and President Bush has signed, a federal ban on the use of torture.
While a plurality believes the U.S. does torture terrorist prisoners, 66% believe that the United States treats prisoners of war better than most other nations. Just 16% disagree on this point. In fact, the Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 78% of voters believe that the terrorists torture U.S. soldiers. Only 4% disagree on this point.
Fifty-three percent (53%) say that the U.S. should not torture prisoners while 27% believe it should. Forty-one percent (41%) believe torture helps gain valuable information that protects U.S. soldiers while 35% say it does not. In his remarks last week, the President stated that interrogation techniques have provided valuable information that have helped protect the American people.
Another Reason It is Not Good to Privatize National Security
The Washington Post Reports
U.S. intelligence officials will investigate allegations that the government improperly leaked a secretly obtained Osama bin Laden video, alerting al-Qaeda to a security gap in the terrorist group's internal communications network that it was able to shut, an intelligence spokesman said yesterday.
Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for the director of national intelligence, said officials are looking into the leak allegation by the SITE Intelligence Group, which passed the video on to the White House and the director of national intelligence's office before its leak.
"At this point, we don't think there was a leak from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence or the National Counterterrorism Center," Feinstein said.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, responding to a description of the leak in yesterday's editions of The Washington Post, told reporters that "this was a cause of concern that the information was leaked. And I would have to refer to the DNI's office in regards to any possible investigation into that leak."
Frances Fragos Townsend, the White House homeland security adviser, expressed concern about the leak in a news conference, saying the government needs the cooperation of private individuals and companies in stopping terrorist groups.
U.S. intelligence officials will investigate allegations that the government improperly leaked a secretly obtained Osama bin Laden video, alerting al-Qaeda to a security gap in the terrorist group's internal communications network that it was able to shut, an intelligence spokesman said yesterday.
Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for the director of national intelligence, said officials are looking into the leak allegation by the SITE Intelligence Group, which passed the video on to the White House and the director of national intelligence's office before its leak.
"At this point, we don't think there was a leak from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence or the National Counterterrorism Center," Feinstein said.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, responding to a description of the leak in yesterday's editions of The Washington Post, told reporters that "this was a cause of concern that the information was leaked. And I would have to refer to the DNI's office in regards to any possible investigation into that leak."
Frances Fragos Townsend, the White House homeland security adviser, expressed concern about the leak in a news conference, saying the government needs the cooperation of private individuals and companies in stopping terrorist groups.
Dear Abby for Same-Sex Marriage
The latest champion for same-sex marriage comes from a columnist who is regarded by some with the same trust as Reader's Digest.
the AP reports
For years, rumblings have surfaced on the Internet, conjecture about her casual references to "sexual orientation" and "respect."
Now, Dear Abby is ready to say it flatly: She supports same-sex marriage.
"I believe if two people want to commit to each other, God bless 'em," the syndicated advice columnist told The Associated Press. "That is the highest form of commitment, for heaven's sake."
What Jeanne Phillips, aka Abigail Van Buren, finds offensive and misguided are homophobic jokes, phrases like "That's so gay," and parents who reject or try to reform their children when they come out of the closet.
the AP reports
For years, rumblings have surfaced on the Internet, conjecture about her casual references to "sexual orientation" and "respect."
Now, Dear Abby is ready to say it flatly: She supports same-sex marriage.
"I believe if two people want to commit to each other, God bless 'em," the syndicated advice columnist told The Associated Press. "That is the highest form of commitment, for heaven's sake."
What Jeanne Phillips, aka Abigail Van Buren, finds offensive and misguided are homophobic jokes, phrases like "That's so gay," and parents who reject or try to reform their children when they come out of the closet.
Romney Retains Law Firm: Dewey, Blastem, and Howe
Mitt Romney raises more concerns than hackles from Ron Paul during a debate last night.
From CNN Would the U.S. president need Congress' permission before launching an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities?
Responding first, Romney said as president, "you sit down with your attorneys" to determine whether such authorization is needed, but he said, "Obviously, the president of the United States has to do what's in the best interest of the United States to protect us against a potential threat."
Romney's answer drew an incredulous retort from Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who said the president would "absolutely" need Congress' OK before striking Iran.
"This idea of going and talking to attorneys totally baffles me. Why don't we just open up the Constitution and read it?" Paul said. "You're not allowed to go to war without a declaration of war."
From CNN Would the U.S. president need Congress' permission before launching an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities?
Responding first, Romney said as president, "you sit down with your attorneys" to determine whether such authorization is needed, but he said, "Obviously, the president of the United States has to do what's in the best interest of the United States to protect us against a potential threat."
Romney's answer drew an incredulous retort from Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, who said the president would "absolutely" need Congress' OK before striking Iran.
"This idea of going and talking to attorneys totally baffles me. Why don't we just open up the Constitution and read it?" Paul said. "You're not allowed to go to war without a declaration of war."
Democrats Caving In on Iraq or Making It a Wedge Issue?
CNN reports that Congressional Democrats are backing off of legislation to bring the troops home. For an antiwar person, this reeks of power politics--putting party ambitions ahead of the lives of the troops on the ground in Iraq.
Congressional Democrats have put on the back burner legislation ordering troops home from Iraq and turned their attention to war-related proposals that Republicans are finding hard to reject.
The legislative agenda marks a dramatic shift for party leaders who vowed repeated votes to end combat and predicted Republicans would eventually join them. But with Democrats still lacking enough votes to bring troops home, the party runs the risk of concluding its first year in control of Congress with little to show for its tough anti-war rhetoric.
"We can no longer approach the discussion on Iraq as a partisan issue," said Rep. John Tanner, a conservative Democrat from Tennessee. "Our soldiers, sailors, Marines, airmen and guardsmen aren't fighting as Democrats or Republicans but as Americans."
For me, this puts a bad taste in my mouth and makes me wonder if putting a "Republican-lite" Democrat in the White House, House, or Senate will make any difference. This is a time that Progressive Democrats need to come out of the woodwork and contest candidates who have been reluctant to take a strong stance to end the war.
Congressional Democrats have put on the back burner legislation ordering troops home from Iraq and turned their attention to war-related proposals that Republicans are finding hard to reject.
The legislative agenda marks a dramatic shift for party leaders who vowed repeated votes to end combat and predicted Republicans would eventually join them. But with Democrats still lacking enough votes to bring troops home, the party runs the risk of concluding its first year in control of Congress with little to show for its tough anti-war rhetoric.
"We can no longer approach the discussion on Iraq as a partisan issue," said Rep. John Tanner, a conservative Democrat from Tennessee. "Our soldiers, sailors, Marines, airmen and guardsmen aren't fighting as Democrats or Republicans but as Americans."
For me, this puts a bad taste in my mouth and makes me wonder if putting a "Republican-lite" Democrat in the White House, House, or Senate will make any difference. This is a time that Progressive Democrats need to come out of the woodwork and contest candidates who have been reluctant to take a strong stance to end the war.
Iowa City Primary Results : What Do They Mean?
Last night the tea leaves were read and Matt Hayek, Mike Wright, Terry Smith, and (barely) Dee Vanderhoef came through a voter-light Iowa City Council primary where an abysmal 7.7% of eligible voters (3,181 of 41,169 registered) turned out.
From the Press-Citizen
and Gazette
First the trends:
- Matt Hayek, with 70% of the vote is a force to be reckoned with. He was the hands down favorite in 22 of 25 precincts. With a centrist message, strong name recognition factor, and well-oiled campaign organization, it would be very surprising if he
wasn't elected next month.
- Mike Wright and Terry Smith's campaigns are going to have their work cut out. While it is clear that Hayek is "the force" -- Wright and Smith are on opposite ends of the spectrum, albeit both support more police officers and building and staffing a new firehouse. Past trends would favor Smith whose war chest (and potential "volunteer" corp) is likely to be higher than Wright's, but with the uncertainty of who will turn out to vote on November 6th and the Hayek Express moving fast and taking votes equally from the other candidates, Wright with focused effort could edge Smith out. Smith did well on the Southeast side of Iowa City, while Wright found his support among the more densely populated central district neighborhoods.
- Dee Vanderhoef is in serious trouble for her re-election bid. As the incumbent, Vanderhoef going into the primary had an edge over her challengers--she doesn't any more.
What Not to Conclude:
- The general election will yield the same conclusion: While it is very unlikely that the Hayek Express will be derailed, with two referendum items, one of which (the 21-only referendum) may highly impact the type of voter that turns out, it is anyone's guess who will be number two.
- Dee Vanderhoef is cooked: Mike O'Donnell in 2005 was in a similar situation and came in second. Vanderhoef, not known as a hard campaigner, will have to do more to earn the chance for another run on council.
- Brandon Ross is out of touch with voters. He got out of the gate later than the front-runners and almost made it through the primary with very limited campaign support and funds. He has a future, but will need to organize his efforts much better.
From the Press-Citizen
and Gazette
First the trends:
- Matt Hayek, with 70% of the vote is a force to be reckoned with. He was the hands down favorite in 22 of 25 precincts. With a centrist message, strong name recognition factor, and well-oiled campaign organization, it would be very surprising if he
wasn't elected next month.
- Mike Wright and Terry Smith's campaigns are going to have their work cut out. While it is clear that Hayek is "the force" -- Wright and Smith are on opposite ends of the spectrum, albeit both support more police officers and building and staffing a new firehouse. Past trends would favor Smith whose war chest (and potential "volunteer" corp) is likely to be higher than Wright's, but with the uncertainty of who will turn out to vote on November 6th and the Hayek Express moving fast and taking votes equally from the other candidates, Wright with focused effort could edge Smith out. Smith did well on the Southeast side of Iowa City, while Wright found his support among the more densely populated central district neighborhoods.
- Dee Vanderhoef is in serious trouble for her re-election bid. As the incumbent, Vanderhoef going into the primary had an edge over her challengers--she doesn't any more.
What Not to Conclude:
- The general election will yield the same conclusion: While it is very unlikely that the Hayek Express will be derailed, with two referendum items, one of which (the 21-only referendum) may highly impact the type of voter that turns out, it is anyone's guess who will be number two.
- Dee Vanderhoef is cooked: Mike O'Donnell in 2005 was in a similar situation and came in second. Vanderhoef, not known as a hard campaigner, will have to do more to earn the chance for another run on council.
- Brandon Ross is out of touch with voters. He got out of the gate later than the front-runners and almost made it through the primary with very limited campaign support and funds. He has a future, but will need to organize his efforts much better.
Tuesday, October 9
Iraqis Demand US Cur Ties to Blackwater
From the BBC
Iraq has demanded that the US end its association with private security firm Blackwater within six months. It accuses Blackwater guards of having deliberately fired on Iraqi civilians, killing 17 and injuring more than 20.
The government has demanded Blackwater pay $8m compensation to each family bereaved by last month's shootings.
Private security employees are immune from prosecution in Iraq, but an FBI investigation into the killings raises the prospect of trials in the US.
The new details of Iraq's demands were outlined in an official report issued on Monday in Arabic and subsequently translated by international news agencies.
The report says in the time since Blackwater took over security for US diplomats in 2003, its guards have killed 38 Iraqi civilians and wounded about 50 in shootings.
It also says Blackwater’s licence to operate in Iraq expired in 2006, meaning it had no immunity from prosecution under the laws introduced by the US authorities in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
The Iraqi panel led by the defence minister calls for the US to hand over Blackwater guards to face possible trial in Iraqi courts.
Iraq has demanded that the US end its association with private security firm Blackwater within six months. It accuses Blackwater guards of having deliberately fired on Iraqi civilians, killing 17 and injuring more than 20.
The government has demanded Blackwater pay $8m compensation to each family bereaved by last month's shootings.
Private security employees are immune from prosecution in Iraq, but an FBI investigation into the killings raises the prospect of trials in the US.
The new details of Iraq's demands were outlined in an official report issued on Monday in Arabic and subsequently translated by international news agencies.
The report says in the time since Blackwater took over security for US diplomats in 2003, its guards have killed 38 Iraqi civilians and wounded about 50 in shootings.
It also says Blackwater’s licence to operate in Iraq expired in 2006, meaning it had no immunity from prosecution under the laws introduced by the US authorities in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
The Iraqi panel led by the defence minister calls for the US to hand over Blackwater guards to face possible trial in Iraqi courts.
Squeamish Supreme Court Takes a Powder on Torture Case
The NY Times reports:
A German citizen who said he was kidnapped by the Central Intelligence Agency and tortured in a prison in Afghanistan lost his last chance to seek redress in court today when the Supreme Court declined to consider his case.
The justices’ refusal to take the case of Khaled el-Masri let stand a March 2 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va. That court upheld a 2006 decision by a federal district judge, who dismissed Mr. Masri’s lawsuit on the grounds that trying the case could expose state secrets.
As I have said before, the biggest legacy of this White House will be the chilling effect it has had on civil liberties. If the state secrets in question have to do with the degree of torture that the US government has been a party to, shouldn't a free people know this?
A German citizen who said he was kidnapped by the Central Intelligence Agency and tortured in a prison in Afghanistan lost his last chance to seek redress in court today when the Supreme Court declined to consider his case.
The justices’ refusal to take the case of Khaled el-Masri let stand a March 2 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va. That court upheld a 2006 decision by a federal district judge, who dismissed Mr. Masri’s lawsuit on the grounds that trying the case could expose state secrets.
As I have said before, the biggest legacy of this White House will be the chilling effect it has had on civil liberties. If the state secrets in question have to do with the degree of torture that the US government has been a party to, shouldn't a free people know this?
Unions Go On Strike Until After the Primaries
Candidates looking for the union label from either the SEIU or AFL-CIO, will be bugging out as the unions announced they will not endorse any candidate until after the primaries. The 1.8 million member SEIU, which has been courted heavily by the Clinton, Edwards, and Obama camps, may be reluctant to endorse because of the implosion by Howard Dean in 2004. More from TPM.
Finally a Primary Mike Gravel Can Win or Can He?
With John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama officially pulling out of the Michigan's Jan. 15th primary, TPM asks the obvious--what will Hillary do?
Update: Hillary stays on the ballot.
Essential Estrogen reports Chris Dodd will stay on too.
Update: Hillary stays on the ballot.
Essential Estrogen reports Chris Dodd will stay on too.
Blackwater: Humble Origins
Brasscheck asks:
Who owns Blackwater?
A right wing "good Christian" pro-corporate family that controls over $1 billion in assets amd has been very generous to the Bush family.
Blackwater is just one of their projects.
Where does Blackwater get its personnel? Ex-US military, of course. They also go to places like Chile and Colombia to hire US-trained right wing gun thugs.
Could Blackwater ever be used against American citizens?
It already has.
Armed Blackwater operatives making $900 per day were the first into New Orleans before FEMA, the Red Cross and the National Guard.
Currently, Blackwater is suing the families of four of its employees who were killed in Iraq for $10 million each.
Their offense?
They wanted to know how their family members were killed, the company refused to tell them, so they sued for the information. Watch this.
Who owns Blackwater?
A right wing "good Christian" pro-corporate family that controls over $1 billion in assets amd has been very generous to the Bush family.
Blackwater is just one of their projects.
Where does Blackwater get its personnel? Ex-US military, of course. They also go to places like Chile and Colombia to hire US-trained right wing gun thugs.
Could Blackwater ever be used against American citizens?
It already has.
Armed Blackwater operatives making $900 per day were the first into New Orleans before FEMA, the Red Cross and the National Guard.
Currently, Blackwater is suing the families of four of its employees who were killed in Iraq for $10 million each.
Their offense?
They wanted to know how their family members were killed, the company refused to tell them, so they sued for the information. Watch this.
Spies Like US: Publicizing Privacy
Ever since this cockamamie war on Terror has begun, our own government has been reaching out to corporations to feed them information to feed their national security supercomputers. Last year we found out that the National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth (tons more from Truthdig).
Sen. Patrick Leahy said last January that at least 52 federal agencies use data-mining technologies and at least 199 data-mining programs are operating or planned throughout the government, including 14 within the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. Those do not include programs run by the National Security Agency.
Data mining is a growth industry and bound to grow larger by the year. Americans who have been using credit cards or subscribing to magazines have been leaving a financial identity trail catalogued by database companies and then resold to the U.S. government. Federal and state governments pay about $50 million annually to comb through the databases of one such company, ChoicePoint, which compiles and sells personal information on U.S. residents gathered from sources such as motor vehicle and credit records, car and boat registrations, liens and deed transfers, and military records. There are many others.
People for the American Way says:
Data mining is not an issue only at the federal level. The Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX) is a pilot program currently underway in eight states – Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Utah. The MATRIX is designed to pull together sensitive state, local, and federal law enforcement data and intelligence, as well as information from other public databases such as motor vehicle and property records – including biometric identifying information like digital photographs – into a single system. Private databases that maintain information on individuals would also be included. In addition to being searchable by law enforcement, the MATRIX database could be used to automatically analyze these broad categories of information for “anomalous” or “suspicious” activities and patterns.
So here's my idea. Since our privacy is a matter of public record, maybe we need to find a friendly corporation that will protect our privacy. Basically for a fee, this company will search and purge or store all known data that is out there about us.
Of course, the first place the NSA will get a subpoena for will be this corporation. So, what we need is a sort of a witness protection plan that creates a false identity for us, so that our real information can't be tracked back to us.
Of course, this might raise suspicions and land us in Guantanamo as a enemy combatant.
Sen. Patrick Leahy said last January that at least 52 federal agencies use data-mining technologies and at least 199 data-mining programs are operating or planned throughout the government, including 14 within the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. Those do not include programs run by the National Security Agency.
Data mining is a growth industry and bound to grow larger by the year. Americans who have been using credit cards or subscribing to magazines have been leaving a financial identity trail catalogued by database companies and then resold to the U.S. government. Federal and state governments pay about $50 million annually to comb through the databases of one such company, ChoicePoint, which compiles and sells personal information on U.S. residents gathered from sources such as motor vehicle and credit records, car and boat registrations, liens and deed transfers, and military records. There are many others.
People for the American Way says:
Data mining is not an issue only at the federal level. The Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX) is a pilot program currently underway in eight states – Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Utah. The MATRIX is designed to pull together sensitive state, local, and federal law enforcement data and intelligence, as well as information from other public databases such as motor vehicle and property records – including biometric identifying information like digital photographs – into a single system. Private databases that maintain information on individuals would also be included. In addition to being searchable by law enforcement, the MATRIX database could be used to automatically analyze these broad categories of information for “anomalous” or “suspicious” activities and patterns.
So here's my idea. Since our privacy is a matter of public record, maybe we need to find a friendly corporation that will protect our privacy. Basically for a fee, this company will search and purge or store all known data that is out there about us.
Of course, the first place the NSA will get a subpoena for will be this corporation. So, what we need is a sort of a witness protection plan that creates a false identity for us, so that our real information can't be tracked back to us.
Of course, this might raise suspicions and land us in Guantanamo as a enemy combatant.
From the Folks Who Brought You "Severe Interrogation Techniques"
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports:
Tasers and similar stun guns, increasingly popular among law enforcement agencies nationwide, are generally safe for police to use, says a study paid for by the US Justice Department and released Monday in Seattle.
However, the study's author cautioned that the weapons have the potential to injure or kill.
In the review of 962 reported cases of people jolted with electrical conducted energy weapons, a technical term for devices designed to deliver temporarily disabling bursts of electricity, 99.7 percent had no injuries or had minor ones such as scrapes and bruises that did not require hospitalization.
Touted as "the first large, independent study of injuries associated with Tasers" by the lead researcher, Dr. William Bozeman, an emergency medical specialist at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
In Googling Dr. Bozeman, he has working on this research for the NIJ since 2004 (Researchers will collect data on the proportion of suspects who sustain injuries after less-lethal weapons (both conducted energy devices and kinetic impact weapons) are used during their apprehension by law enforcement officers and on the severity of those injuries. The data will be collected from 12 law enforcement agencies and reviewed by physicians with extensive experience in law enforcement operations.) and has presented his finding to the Police Chief's Association as long ago as June of 2006.
Of course there is another side to the story.
Tasers and similar stun guns, increasingly popular among law enforcement agencies nationwide, are generally safe for police to use, says a study paid for by the US Justice Department and released Monday in Seattle.
However, the study's author cautioned that the weapons have the potential to injure or kill.
In the review of 962 reported cases of people jolted with electrical conducted energy weapons, a technical term for devices designed to deliver temporarily disabling bursts of electricity, 99.7 percent had no injuries or had minor ones such as scrapes and bruises that did not require hospitalization.
Touted as "the first large, independent study of injuries associated with Tasers" by the lead researcher, Dr. William Bozeman, an emergency medical specialist at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
In Googling Dr. Bozeman, he has working on this research for the NIJ since 2004 (Researchers will collect data on the proportion of suspects who sustain injuries after less-lethal weapons (both conducted energy devices and kinetic impact weapons) are used during their apprehension by law enforcement officers and on the severity of those injuries. The data will be collected from 12 law enforcement agencies and reviewed by physicians with extensive experience in law enforcement operations.) and has presented his finding to the Police Chief's Association as long ago as June of 2006.
Of course there is another side to the story.
Monday, October 8
US Government: Swinging Both Ways
The US and Great Britain, democracy-promoters in principle, do not practice it and support some fairly vile characters (some of whom they later track down spider holes and, in theory, bring to justice). In Pakistan, Gen. Musharraf is surviving an economy that is erratic to say the least and being pushed to share power with deposed PM Benazir Bhutto, a deal which the US and Britain brokered.
Musharraf, whose legality to be President is being challenged in Pakistan's high court, and whose victory cannot be officially validated until they decide, has been cagey about whether he would step down. Asked whether he would stand down if the court ruled him ineligible, Gen Musharraf said: “Let the decision come and then we will decide.”
Meanwhile in the Sudan, the US continues to dance supporting the government's intelligence efforts (and renditioning of presumed enemies) while challenging their peace efforts between north and south and despite the massacre in Darfur. The CIA operation center in Sudan is said to be the biggest spy operation center in the region.
And this is the way of the struggles between the need for intelligence and a desire to put on a face that suggests friendly relations, even with those who we fundamentally disagree. We are in a rock and a hard place, the bigger question is how did we get here.
Musharraf, whose legality to be President is being challenged in Pakistan's high court, and whose victory cannot be officially validated until they decide, has been cagey about whether he would step down. Asked whether he would stand down if the court ruled him ineligible, Gen Musharraf said: “Let the decision come and then we will decide.”
Meanwhile in the Sudan, the US continues to dance supporting the government's intelligence efforts (and renditioning of presumed enemies) while challenging their peace efforts between north and south and despite the massacre in Darfur. The CIA operation center in Sudan is said to be the biggest spy operation center in the region.
And this is the way of the struggles between the need for intelligence and a desire to put on a face that suggests friendly relations, even with those who we fundamentally disagree. We are in a rock and a hard place, the bigger question is how did we get here.
Things Getting Funky in Parliament
As the British MPs return from their summer recess, anti-war protesters have been told they will be arrested if they bring their protest near the halls of Parliament.
Campaigners say this is the first time Scotland Yard has invoked an ancient law to prevent them demonstrating near Parliament, describing it is an "unprecedented attack on civil liberties". One said the impetus for the crackdown on the march had come from Government, adding: "In this new era [under Gordon Brown] they want to draw a line under the anti-war movement."
The Independent has more.
Campaigners say this is the first time Scotland Yard has invoked an ancient law to prevent them demonstrating near Parliament, describing it is an "unprecedented attack on civil liberties". One said the impetus for the crackdown on the march had come from Government, adding: "In this new era [under Gordon Brown] they want to draw a line under the anti-war movement."
The Independent has more.
Holla' at Hoyer
The last thing we need in 2008 is for the election to come down to a state that has no verifiable way to recount votes.
HR 811, the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, has strong support in Congress, but is held up while House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer negotiates more compromises - after months of negotiation and compromise.
Call 202-225-3130 and urge House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer to bring HR 811 to a vote!
Background
Unless federal or state legislation changes things, 13 states are likely to use paperless electronic voting, either exclusively or extensively, in the 2008 election. Among those states are Texas, Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and South Carolina.
A drumbeat of security reports, including California's landmark voting system review published in August, as well as a comprehensive analysis by a task force of top computer scientists and vote-altering glitches in recent elections have proven this to be a risky and foolish gamble.
Many election officials are balking at the 2008 deadline, because they don't want to go through a change of equipment in a year's time. That is an understandable motive, but states have proven that it can be done in less than a year! Florida is going to prove it by November 2008. New Mexico, North Carolina, and other states have implemented major overhauls in voting equipment in a matter or months. Most importantly, the only equipment changes that would be required for 2008 would be the addition of cash-register style printers to electronic voting machines. These printers are not the solution, but they can help protect the 2008 election.
HR 811 is not perfect, and more will need to be done to protect the vote if it becomes law - much more. See an excellent piece by Matt Zimmerman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
But without the bill, we could forced to spend November 4, 2008 watching the election returns and just hoping that electronic voting machines across the country work correctly.
**Get it to the floor --Call Majority Leader Steny Hoyer at 202-225-3130 and urge him to bring HR 811 to a vote!**
HR 811, the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, has strong support in Congress, but is held up while House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer negotiates more compromises - after months of negotiation and compromise.
Call 202-225-3130 and urge House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer to bring HR 811 to a vote!
Background
Unless federal or state legislation changes things, 13 states are likely to use paperless electronic voting, either exclusively or extensively, in the 2008 election. Among those states are Texas, Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and South Carolina.
A drumbeat of security reports, including California's landmark voting system review published in August, as well as a comprehensive analysis by a task force of top computer scientists and vote-altering glitches in recent elections have proven this to be a risky and foolish gamble.
Many election officials are balking at the 2008 deadline, because they don't want to go through a change of equipment in a year's time. That is an understandable motive, but states have proven that it can be done in less than a year! Florida is going to prove it by November 2008. New Mexico, North Carolina, and other states have implemented major overhauls in voting equipment in a matter or months. Most importantly, the only equipment changes that would be required for 2008 would be the addition of cash-register style printers to electronic voting machines. These printers are not the solution, but they can help protect the 2008 election.
HR 811 is not perfect, and more will need to be done to protect the vote if it becomes law - much more. See an excellent piece by Matt Zimmerman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
But without the bill, we could forced to spend November 4, 2008 watching the election returns and just hoping that electronic voting machines across the country work correctly.
**Get it to the floor --Call Majority Leader Steny Hoyer at 202-225-3130 and urge him to bring HR 811 to a vote!**
Poetic License
One of the more fun things I get to do is to contribute to the the Press-Citizen's "Poetic License" column. In fairness to the czar of the editorial page, Jeff Charis-Carlson, who edits my stuff (well, its more like our stuff, when he gets done with editing), I encourage others to submit your verse. Here's my latest.
Protester Frank Cordaro Privatized in a Missouri Lock-up
"Novice" Mona Shaw at the Catholic Workers House in Des Moines writes:
Last night Frank was transferred from the Polk County Jail to Bethany Missouri. He is doing fine, but will miss the visits he could have had here in Des Moines.
Send your mail and/or US Money Order to:
Frank Cordaro, Pod 2, Bunk 80
Bridewell Detention Facility
4203 Roleke
Bethany, MO 64424
It is nice to know that citizens can be held in privately run jails, particularly this one that looks like a commercial hog containment lot:
More about the "Bridewell Experience"
The Bridewell LLC Detention Facility provides it's service to the private corrections sector and houses an excess inmate population from surrounding counties and/or states. We seek to add clients from around the Midwest as well as pursuing a federal contract. Bridewell LLC was incorporated in January of 2004, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Polk County Land and Leasing Group LLC. Initially, the first client that enterd into an agreement was Polk County, Iowa.
The Bridewell Detention Facility management is based upon "Direct Supervision" jail philosophy, a more modern and humane approach over a traditional linear-style institution. Direct Supervision philosophy is a combination of management style and architectural design which facilitates increased staff and inmate contact and works to reduce tension and improve security within the correctional setting.
These facilities like the Bridewell Detention Facility are known as "Direct Supervision" jails, and they are generally regarded as the state of the art in jail design. In form, function, and style, they are significantly different from the old traditional jails. They have proven to be secure, safe, and cost-efficient places for inmates to live and for staff to work.
Contact Information
Bridewell Detention Facility
4203 Roleke Drive
Bethany, Missouri 64424
Phone (660) 425-7663
Fax (660) 425-7378
E-mail info@bridewelldetention.com
Last night Frank was transferred from the Polk County Jail to Bethany Missouri. He is doing fine, but will miss the visits he could have had here in Des Moines.
Send your mail and/or US Money Order to:
Frank Cordaro, Pod 2, Bunk 80
Bridewell Detention Facility
4203 Roleke
Bethany, MO 64424
It is nice to know that citizens can be held in privately run jails, particularly this one that looks like a commercial hog containment lot:
More about the "Bridewell Experience"
The Bridewell LLC Detention Facility provides it's service to the private corrections sector and houses an excess inmate population from surrounding counties and/or states. We seek to add clients from around the Midwest as well as pursuing a federal contract. Bridewell LLC was incorporated in January of 2004, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Polk County Land and Leasing Group LLC. Initially, the first client that enterd into an agreement was Polk County, Iowa.
The Bridewell Detention Facility management is based upon "Direct Supervision" jail philosophy, a more modern and humane approach over a traditional linear-style institution. Direct Supervision philosophy is a combination of management style and architectural design which facilitates increased staff and inmate contact and works to reduce tension and improve security within the correctional setting.
These facilities like the Bridewell Detention Facility are known as "Direct Supervision" jails, and they are generally regarded as the state of the art in jail design. In form, function, and style, they are significantly different from the old traditional jails. They have proven to be secure, safe, and cost-efficient places for inmates to live and for staff to work.
Contact Information
Bridewell Detention Facility
4203 Roleke Drive
Bethany, Missouri 64424
Phone (660) 425-7663
Fax (660) 425-7378
E-mail info@bridewelldetention.com
Sunday, October 7
Supporting a Candidate is No Picnic
As readers of this blog know, I am a supporter of John Edwards, but I am cynical enough to not usually get too wrapped up in the party aspect of things. Still, while it takes a lot to get me to an event like this, the JC Dems BBQ was really exciting.
I was astonished at the number of people who showed their colors for their favorite candidate. I think the Biden camp's corn mascot was my favorite. Certainly in sheer numbers, all the candidates with the exception of Mike Gravel had their share of supporters.
In the well-represented Edwards camp, we stood by the highway entrance to the event with our signs and chanting things like "Who works for you? John Edwards works for you. And when he works, he works to bring big change" and "We love Elizabeth, We love John, we want to see them on the White House lawn" (though personally, I'd much rather have them inside the White House). Of course, we were competing with an abortion protester across the road with a bullhorn and someone who had a bone to pick with HRC.
When John and Elizabeth Edwards arrived, we followed them and the media into the super-heated swine barn for his speech and showed our support for him and his issues by waving our signs and applauding when he talked about reducing poverty, health care, ending the war, fighting global warming, and so on.
The downside of course, was I was starving and had not planned to be a part of the whooping and hollering. So, even for a cynic, it was a blast. It was like being at the political mall and you could shop the candidates' issues and others who were educating about supporting kids, the environment, Darfur, ending global poverty and on and on.
Of course the local politicos were out in force. Council candidates Mike Wtight, Brandon Ross, and Matt Hayek shared a table with Regenia Bailey (whose t-shirt has a silhouette of her or perhaps, it actually Liza Minelli). Council candidate Mitch Gross from Coralville was there, as was North Liberty's James Moody. Supervisor Rod Sullivan and County Sheriff Lonny Pulkrabek were there. Congressman Dave Loebsack, of course. Also sighted were Joe Bolkcom and Dave Jacoby.
Despite the excitement, after three hours of speeches, picking up literature and stuff, and the requisite milling about, I left.
The Press-Citizen puts the turnout at 2000, but I think it was a much higher.
I was astonished at the number of people who showed their colors for their favorite candidate. I think the Biden camp's corn mascot was my favorite. Certainly in sheer numbers, all the candidates with the exception of Mike Gravel had their share of supporters.
In the well-represented Edwards camp, we stood by the highway entrance to the event with our signs and chanting things like "Who works for you? John Edwards works for you. And when he works, he works to bring big change" and "We love Elizabeth, We love John, we want to see them on the White House lawn" (though personally, I'd much rather have them inside the White House). Of course, we were competing with an abortion protester across the road with a bullhorn and someone who had a bone to pick with HRC.
When John and Elizabeth Edwards arrived, we followed them and the media into the super-heated swine barn for his speech and showed our support for him and his issues by waving our signs and applauding when he talked about reducing poverty, health care, ending the war, fighting global warming, and so on.
The downside of course, was I was starving and had not planned to be a part of the whooping and hollering. So, even for a cynic, it was a blast. It was like being at the political mall and you could shop the candidates' issues and others who were educating about supporting kids, the environment, Darfur, ending global poverty and on and on.
Of course the local politicos were out in force. Council candidates Mike Wtight, Brandon Ross, and Matt Hayek shared a table with Regenia Bailey (whose t-shirt has a silhouette of her or perhaps, it actually Liza Minelli). Council candidate Mitch Gross from Coralville was there, as was North Liberty's James Moody. Supervisor Rod Sullivan and County Sheriff Lonny Pulkrabek were there. Congressman Dave Loebsack, of course. Also sighted were Joe Bolkcom and Dave Jacoby.
Despite the excitement, after three hours of speeches, picking up literature and stuff, and the requisite milling about, I left.
The Press-Citizen puts the turnout at 2000, but I think it was a much higher.
Friday, October 5
Two Fingers to One
As I was participating in the Peace Vigil on the corner of Clinton and Washington late this afternoon, a robust young man with close cropped hair in a blue button down oxford shirt stood across the street yelling obscenities and flipping our group the bird. As usual, I retorted with the peace sign (the dove is a bird too). However, a fellow "vigilante" resorted to a string of obscenities much more vulgar than the other fellow and then told the fellow to "go enlist."
This is when I truly get sad; what hope is there when peace folk engage in an escalation against those with whom we disagree?
But, as another person said to me, we all are there with differing ideas about how to get to peace. I just happen to prefer "be the change you hope to see" as a philosophical base.
Peace.
This is when I truly get sad; what hope is there when peace folk engage in an escalation against those with whom we disagree?
But, as another person said to me, we all are there with differing ideas about how to get to peace. I just happen to prefer "be the change you hope to see" as a philosophical base.
Peace.
Cordero in Polk County Jail
Frank Cordaro just received thirty days in the Polk County jail after pleading guilty to criminal trespass.
Cordaro, and two other defendants Renee Espeland and Aaron Glynn appeared at the Polk County Court House at 1:00 p.m. today to face trespassing charges they received after the September 21st occupation of Senator Grassley's office.
The three adults had joined the high school student-led occupation that grew out of the HS student group "Students Beyond War." The Sept. 21 occupation was an act of non-violent civil disobedience in protest to the war in Iraq to demand that Senator Grassley stop voting to fund this immoral, illegal and unjust war.
The judge responded harshly in an attempt to deter further acts of civil resistance. Renee and Aaron, a senior at Hoover High School, each received fines over $300 and were released. Frank's was taken into custody, and his 30-day sentence began immediately. He is being held in the Polk County Jail.
This sentence is clearly an attempt to stop those who seek peace to stop seeking it. The harsher consequences also mean our efforts are working. Let us not be intimidated. Let's respond to this by increasing our efforts to end this insane war and future war.
If you are interested in a participating in an organized response, or have any questions in general, please contact Des Moines Catholic Workers:
Mona Shaw
monashaw@aol.com
319-621-4646 (cell)
John Tuzcu
jtuzcu@gmail.com
216-533-9925
www.desmoinescatholicworker.org
Cordaro, and two other defendants Renee Espeland and Aaron Glynn appeared at the Polk County Court House at 1:00 p.m. today to face trespassing charges they received after the September 21st occupation of Senator Grassley's office.
The three adults had joined the high school student-led occupation that grew out of the HS student group "Students Beyond War." The Sept. 21 occupation was an act of non-violent civil disobedience in protest to the war in Iraq to demand that Senator Grassley stop voting to fund this immoral, illegal and unjust war.
The judge responded harshly in an attempt to deter further acts of civil resistance. Renee and Aaron, a senior at Hoover High School, each received fines over $300 and were released. Frank's was taken into custody, and his 30-day sentence began immediately. He is being held in the Polk County Jail.
This sentence is clearly an attempt to stop those who seek peace to stop seeking it. The harsher consequences also mean our efforts are working. Let us not be intimidated. Let's respond to this by increasing our efforts to end this insane war and future war.
If you are interested in a participating in an organized response, or have any questions in general, please contact Des Moines Catholic Workers:
Mona Shaw
monashaw@aol.com
319-621-4646 (cell)
John Tuzcu
jtuzcu@gmail.com
216-533-9925
www.desmoinescatholicworker.org
Uh, About the Torture Thing...
NY Times: Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3 — When the Justice Department publicly declared torture “abhorrent” in a legal opinion in December 2004, the Bush administration appeared to have abandoned its assertion of nearly unlimited presidential authority to order brutal interrogations.
But soon after Alberto R. Gonzales’s arrival as attorney general in February 2005, the Justice Department issued another opinion, this one in secret. It was a very different document, according to officials briefed on it, an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency.
The new opinion, the officials said, for the first time provided explicit authorization to barrage terror suspects with a combination of painful physical and psychological tactics, including head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid temperatures.
Mr. Gonzales approved the legal memorandum on “combined effects” over the objections of James B. Comey, the deputy attorney general, who was leaving his job after bruising clashes with the White House. Disagreeing with what he viewed as the opinion’s overreaching legal reasoning, Mr. Comey told colleagues at the department that they would all be “ashamed” when the world eventually learned of it.
Later that year, as Congress moved toward outlawing “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment, the Justice Department issued another secret opinion, one most lawmakers did not know existed, current and former officials said. The Justice Department document declared that none of the C.I.A. interrogation methods violated that standard.
The classified opinions, never previously disclosed, are a hidden legacy of President Bush’s second term and Mr. Gonzales’s tenure at the Justice Department, where he moved quickly to align it with the White House after a 2004 rebellion by staff lawyers that had thrown policies on surveillance and detention into turmoil.
Congress and the Supreme Court have intervened repeatedly in the last two years to impose limits on interrogations, and the administration has responded as a policy matter by dropping the most extreme techniques. But the 2005 Justice Department opinions remain in effect, and their legal conclusions have been confirmed by several more recent memorandums, officials said. They show how the White House has succeeded in preserving the broadest possible legal latitude for harsh tactics.
A White House spokesman, Tony Fratto, said Wednesday that he would not comment on any legal opinion related to interrogations. Mr. Fratto added, “We have gone to great lengths, including statutory efforts and the recent executive order, to make it clear that the intelligence community and our practices fall within U.S. law” and international agreements.
More than two dozen current and former officials involved in counterterrorism were interviewed over the past three months about the opinions and the deliberations on interrogation policy. Most officials would speak only on the condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the documents and the C.I.A. detention operations they govern. More
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3 — When the Justice Department publicly declared torture “abhorrent” in a legal opinion in December 2004, the Bush administration appeared to have abandoned its assertion of nearly unlimited presidential authority to order brutal interrogations.
But soon after Alberto R. Gonzales’s arrival as attorney general in February 2005, the Justice Department issued another opinion, this one in secret. It was a very different document, according to officials briefed on it, an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency.
The new opinion, the officials said, for the first time provided explicit authorization to barrage terror suspects with a combination of painful physical and psychological tactics, including head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid temperatures.
Mr. Gonzales approved the legal memorandum on “combined effects” over the objections of James B. Comey, the deputy attorney general, who was leaving his job after bruising clashes with the White House. Disagreeing with what he viewed as the opinion’s overreaching legal reasoning, Mr. Comey told colleagues at the department that they would all be “ashamed” when the world eventually learned of it.
Later that year, as Congress moved toward outlawing “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment, the Justice Department issued another secret opinion, one most lawmakers did not know existed, current and former officials said. The Justice Department document declared that none of the C.I.A. interrogation methods violated that standard.
The classified opinions, never previously disclosed, are a hidden legacy of President Bush’s second term and Mr. Gonzales’s tenure at the Justice Department, where he moved quickly to align it with the White House after a 2004 rebellion by staff lawyers that had thrown policies on surveillance and detention into turmoil.
Congress and the Supreme Court have intervened repeatedly in the last two years to impose limits on interrogations, and the administration has responded as a policy matter by dropping the most extreme techniques. But the 2005 Justice Department opinions remain in effect, and their legal conclusions have been confirmed by several more recent memorandums, officials said. They show how the White House has succeeded in preserving the broadest possible legal latitude for harsh tactics.
A White House spokesman, Tony Fratto, said Wednesday that he would not comment on any legal opinion related to interrogations. Mr. Fratto added, “We have gone to great lengths, including statutory efforts and the recent executive order, to make it clear that the intelligence community and our practices fall within U.S. law” and international agreements.
More than two dozen current and former officials involved in counterterrorism were interviewed over the past three months about the opinions and the deliberations on interrogation policy. Most officials would speak only on the condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the documents and the C.I.A. detention operations they govern. More
OUCH! Paul Waldman's Article Cuts Deep
Paul Waldman makes several valid points about the importance of Iowa and New Hampshire in deciding the fate of candidates, but still, c'mon, picking on Iowa?
From the Waterloo Courier.
An article in the new issue of "The American Prospect" magazine says Iowa doesn't deserve its prominent role in nominating presidential candidates.
"What no one involved in any campaign will acknowledge, and few commentators will either, is that this system is not merely curious or even unfair, it is utterly perverse," states the article, written by media critic Paul Waldman.
"This isn't just because the rest of us get virtually no say in who the parties' nominees are. It's also because of this simple fact: No small group of Americans deserves this power, but if any does, it sure isn't the citizens of Iowa."
Waldman says Iowans are apathetic about the caucuses, as shown by the fact that only about one in 10 eligible voters participate.
"As you read this, some of the most important and powerful people in America are crawling through the Hawkeye State on their knees, pretending to know more than they do about corn, pretending that the deep-fried Twinkie they had back at the State Fair was just dee-licious, pretending that ethanol is the key to our energy future, and pretending that every precinct captain and PTA chair they meet is the very heart and soul of our nation, whose opinions the candidate is just dying to hear," Waldman writes.
"The American Prospect" is a left-leaning journal which lists a print circulation of 55,000 and online readership of more than 300,000.
From the Waterloo Courier.
An article in the new issue of "The American Prospect" magazine says Iowa doesn't deserve its prominent role in nominating presidential candidates.
"What no one involved in any campaign will acknowledge, and few commentators will either, is that this system is not merely curious or even unfair, it is utterly perverse," states the article, written by media critic Paul Waldman.
"This isn't just because the rest of us get virtually no say in who the parties' nominees are. It's also because of this simple fact: No small group of Americans deserves this power, but if any does, it sure isn't the citizens of Iowa."
Waldman says Iowans are apathetic about the caucuses, as shown by the fact that only about one in 10 eligible voters participate.
"As you read this, some of the most important and powerful people in America are crawling through the Hawkeye State on their knees, pretending to know more than they do about corn, pretending that the deep-fried Twinkie they had back at the State Fair was just dee-licious, pretending that ethanol is the key to our energy future, and pretending that every precinct captain and PTA chair they meet is the very heart and soul of our nation, whose opinions the candidate is just dying to hear," Waldman writes.
"The American Prospect" is a left-leaning journal which lists a print circulation of 55,000 and online readership of more than 300,000.
Non-Iraq Defense Spending Up $43 Billion
From the NY Times
The Senate on Wednesday approved $459 billion in spending for the Pentagon, after adding $3 billion for security at the Mexican border.
The bill, passed by voice vote, does not include President Bush’s request for almost $190 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill would increase other Pentagon spending $43 billion, up more than 10 percent from the last budget.
Much of the new money would be devoted to procuring new weapons, including the V-22 tilt rotor aircraft, unmanned drone aircraft, the next generation of Joint Strike Fighters and the F-22 Raptor fighter jet.
The border security money had been in a spending bill for the Homeland Security Department that Mr. Bush has promised to veto because it exceeds his budget request by $2 billion.
By shifting the money to the Pentagon bill, Republican leaders hoped to preserve the financing without embarrassing the president by overriding his veto. The military bill includes more money for National Guard equipment and military health care and a 3.5 percent pay increase for military personnel.
The Senate on Wednesday approved $459 billion in spending for the Pentagon, after adding $3 billion for security at the Mexican border.
The bill, passed by voice vote, does not include President Bush’s request for almost $190 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill would increase other Pentagon spending $43 billion, up more than 10 percent from the last budget.
Much of the new money would be devoted to procuring new weapons, including the V-22 tilt rotor aircraft, unmanned drone aircraft, the next generation of Joint Strike Fighters and the F-22 Raptor fighter jet.
The border security money had been in a spending bill for the Homeland Security Department that Mr. Bush has promised to veto because it exceeds his budget request by $2 billion.
By shifting the money to the Pentagon bill, Republican leaders hoped to preserve the financing without embarrassing the president by overriding his veto. The military bill includes more money for National Guard equipment and military health care and a 3.5 percent pay increase for military personnel.
Hoyer Helps Republicans
From the Open Left
ACLU that a new and bad FISA bill is about to be unveiled today at 1:30pm by Steny Hoyer in a press-only briefing. Telecom immunity is not in the bill, but the Senate is pressing hard for that to be included.
The dynamic in the House is really odd. Hoyer and Emanuel seem to be pushing for a FISA capitulation to 'protect the freshmen', even though the freshmen understand their constituents don't want a FISA capitulation. No one will go on the record on any of this, and Emanuel and Hoyer aren't voting for the capitulation, only orchestrating its passage.
This is not a surprise, though it is amusing that Pelosi's promises to 'fix' the temporary FISA bill passed in August are as worthless as they appeared at the time.
What's weird is that no one wants this capitulation except Hoyer and Emanuel. The Bush Dogs are going to vote for it, since that's what they would do, but they would vote for a better bill. The freshmen don't feel politically threatened by a better bill, and know that standing up to Bush is popular. It's like the House is operating on conservative autopilot.
The progressive caucus is unified against the bill. If there's a way to beat this back, it's through the freshmen. I hope they start speaking out against it.
UPDATE: I should say that I don't have the specifics of the bill, which will be unveiled tomorrow. But it's telling the ACLU and civil liberties experts were cut out of the process.
ACLU that a new and bad FISA bill is about to be unveiled today at 1:30pm by Steny Hoyer in a press-only briefing. Telecom immunity is not in the bill, but the Senate is pressing hard for that to be included.
The dynamic in the House is really odd. Hoyer and Emanuel seem to be pushing for a FISA capitulation to 'protect the freshmen', even though the freshmen understand their constituents don't want a FISA capitulation. No one will go on the record on any of this, and Emanuel and Hoyer aren't voting for the capitulation, only orchestrating its passage.
This is not a surprise, though it is amusing that Pelosi's promises to 'fix' the temporary FISA bill passed in August are as worthless as they appeared at the time.
What's weird is that no one wants this capitulation except Hoyer and Emanuel. The Bush Dogs are going to vote for it, since that's what they would do, but they would vote for a better bill. The freshmen don't feel politically threatened by a better bill, and know that standing up to Bush is popular. It's like the House is operating on conservative autopilot.
The progressive caucus is unified against the bill. If there's a way to beat this back, it's through the freshmen. I hope they start speaking out against it.
UPDATE: I should say that I don't have the specifics of the bill, which will be unveiled tomorrow. But it's telling the ACLU and civil liberties experts were cut out of the process.
Bush, Clinton, Bush, Cli...Not So Fast
Clinton is far from 'inevitable'
By Scot Lehigh | October 5, 2007
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/10/05/clinton_is_far_from_inevitable/
PREPARING TO leave Iowa just before the 2004 caucuses, I picked up the national newsweeklies to read on the plane. One story in particular caught my eye: a cover piece on Howard Dean that, in exploring how he might match up against George W. Bush and speculating about possible VP choices, conveyed the unmistakable impression that the good doctor had the Democratic nomination pretty much wrapped up.
There's a lesson there at a time when some pundits and prognosticators (and even presidents) are starting to view Hillary Clinton as a formidable force on a glide path to the 2008 Democratic nod.
Certainly Clinton has good reason to be pleased with her recent progress. Her healthcare plan played to strong reviews, her latest fund-raising total bested Barack Obama's, and a new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows her not just with a large lead over her Democratic rivals, but also beating Republican front-runner Rudy Giuliani by eight points.
Further, the profusion of primary contests slated for Feb. 5 should impart a real advantage to a well-financed front-runner - as long as she emerges from the first few contests intact, that is.
But if Clinton is in an enviable position, she is far from inevitable.
Just ask Gary Hart.
"I went through the same kind of experience in the fall of 1983 with Vice President Mondale," recalls the erstwhile Colorado senator.
As a former vice president, Mondale was treated as the prohibitive front-runner. Still, after Hart finished a distant second in Iowa, his own campaign took off like a prairie fire. He upended Mondale in New Hampshire, then rode that momentum to a strong showing on Super Tuesday. The two battled all the way to the last primaries, and beyond. Despite the support of the Democratic establishment, Mondale barely staved Hart off.
"Voters have a very strange way of not listening to the pundits," Hart notes wryly.
Part of the disconnect lies in the great disparity in attention currently being paid to the race. Activists and junkies have been following every twist and turn for months. But what one hears from everyday people is that many simply haven't tuned in in a serious way yet. Certainly that's the message I got from students I interviewed at the University of New Hampshire last week; most had just begun thinking about the race.
"The full-time professional political aparatus . . . lives and breathes this stuff, but a whole lot of people aren't even going to pay attention until after the World Series," says Hart.
What's more, in New Hampshire, where primary voters pride themselves on watching and weighing the candidates for months before making up their minds for good, it's doubly dangerous to mistake early inclinations for final voting decisions.
John Kerry, who bounced back to win the 2004 nomination despite being widely written off in the fall of 2003, credits Clinton with running a strong and capable campaign, but notes: "Crunch time really won't come until the last six weeks or so." Only then, he says, will voters truly zero in.
Further, the stultifying nature of a race in which one candidate is treated as inevitable can create a backlash of its own. (That's particularly true when a candidate seems as cautious and calculating as Clinton did in last week's Dartmouth College debate.) That's one reason why Al Gore, a sitting vice president, came close to losing New Hampshire in 2000.
Then there's a crucial unknown: what issues will drive the campaign when crunch time finally comes. So far, the Democratic race barely qualifies as a pillow fight. Yes, we've had a number of forums, but the contest isn't really joined; in primary politics, the gloves start coming off when the cold weather sets in.
And if history is any guide, Clinton is all but certain to face a test that, if flubbed, could slow or even derail her candidacy.
"I haven't seen one campaign that didn't go through a valley before it was over - and there is always a lot of danger with the Clintons," notes one savvy presidential-trail veteran.
So despite a growing tendency to see Clinton as all but unstoppable, the bet here is that the Democratic campaign will become a real contest, and not an easy coronation - no matter how much the Clinton camp might wish otherwise
By Scot Lehigh | October 5, 2007
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/10/05/clinton_is_far_from_inevitable/
PREPARING TO leave Iowa just before the 2004 caucuses, I picked up the national newsweeklies to read on the plane. One story in particular caught my eye: a cover piece on Howard Dean that, in exploring how he might match up against George W. Bush and speculating about possible VP choices, conveyed the unmistakable impression that the good doctor had the Democratic nomination pretty much wrapped up.
There's a lesson there at a time when some pundits and prognosticators (and even presidents) are starting to view Hillary Clinton as a formidable force on a glide path to the 2008 Democratic nod.
Certainly Clinton has good reason to be pleased with her recent progress. Her healthcare plan played to strong reviews, her latest fund-raising total bested Barack Obama's, and a new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows her not just with a large lead over her Democratic rivals, but also beating Republican front-runner Rudy Giuliani by eight points.
Further, the profusion of primary contests slated for Feb. 5 should impart a real advantage to a well-financed front-runner - as long as she emerges from the first few contests intact, that is.
But if Clinton is in an enviable position, she is far from inevitable.
Just ask Gary Hart.
"I went through the same kind of experience in the fall of 1983 with Vice President Mondale," recalls the erstwhile Colorado senator.
As a former vice president, Mondale was treated as the prohibitive front-runner. Still, after Hart finished a distant second in Iowa, his own campaign took off like a prairie fire. He upended Mondale in New Hampshire, then rode that momentum to a strong showing on Super Tuesday. The two battled all the way to the last primaries, and beyond. Despite the support of the Democratic establishment, Mondale barely staved Hart off.
"Voters have a very strange way of not listening to the pundits," Hart notes wryly.
Part of the disconnect lies in the great disparity in attention currently being paid to the race. Activists and junkies have been following every twist and turn for months. But what one hears from everyday people is that many simply haven't tuned in in a serious way yet. Certainly that's the message I got from students I interviewed at the University of New Hampshire last week; most had just begun thinking about the race.
"The full-time professional political aparatus . . . lives and breathes this stuff, but a whole lot of people aren't even going to pay attention until after the World Series," says Hart.
What's more, in New Hampshire, where primary voters pride themselves on watching and weighing the candidates for months before making up their minds for good, it's doubly dangerous to mistake early inclinations for final voting decisions.
John Kerry, who bounced back to win the 2004 nomination despite being widely written off in the fall of 2003, credits Clinton with running a strong and capable campaign, but notes: "Crunch time really won't come until the last six weeks or so." Only then, he says, will voters truly zero in.
Further, the stultifying nature of a race in which one candidate is treated as inevitable can create a backlash of its own. (That's particularly true when a candidate seems as cautious and calculating as Clinton did in last week's Dartmouth College debate.) That's one reason why Al Gore, a sitting vice president, came close to losing New Hampshire in 2000.
Then there's a crucial unknown: what issues will drive the campaign when crunch time finally comes. So far, the Democratic race barely qualifies as a pillow fight. Yes, we've had a number of forums, but the contest isn't really joined; in primary politics, the gloves start coming off when the cold weather sets in.
And if history is any guide, Clinton is all but certain to face a test that, if flubbed, could slow or even derail her candidacy.
"I haven't seen one campaign that didn't go through a valley before it was over - and there is always a lot of danger with the Clintons," notes one savvy presidential-trail veteran.
So despite a growing tendency to see Clinton as all but unstoppable, the bet here is that the Democratic campaign will become a real contest, and not an easy coronation - no matter how much the Clinton camp might wish otherwise
Sin Tax Working Both Ways
The good thing about legislation that ties taxes to things that are lethal is that if they work, the things the taxes pay for are not as likely to be needed, like long-term healthcare for smokers. The downside is, sometimes people just go elsewhere to continue their vice.
This from the Press-Citizen
State officials say Iowa's higher cigarette taxes are prompting more people to kick the habit - or at least try.
Cigarette sales in Iowa have dipped 30 percent in the last three months, says Mike Lipsman of the state Department of Revenue. The decrease follows the $1-per-pack tax increase implemented by the state in March, forcing people to dish out an extra $1.36 for smokes.
Lipsman says the decreased sales can be attributed to a drop in demand, but he acknowledges that more Iowans may be buying their cigarettes in neighboring states that have lower cigarette taxes.
Lipsman says 246.3 million packs of cigarettes were sold in Iowa last year - a figure he expects to drop to 190.5 million this year and to 186.6 million in 2008.
"All the information we've gotten is that virtually everything that we thought would happen has happened," says Chuck Reed of the American Cancer Society's Iowa chapter. "I think that just shows that people do want to quit smoking, and the tax has brought about a lot of that because it's very expensive now to buy a carton of cigarettes."
This from the Press-Citizen
State officials say Iowa's higher cigarette taxes are prompting more people to kick the habit - or at least try.
Cigarette sales in Iowa have dipped 30 percent in the last three months, says Mike Lipsman of the state Department of Revenue. The decrease follows the $1-per-pack tax increase implemented by the state in March, forcing people to dish out an extra $1.36 for smokes.
Lipsman says the decreased sales can be attributed to a drop in demand, but he acknowledges that more Iowans may be buying their cigarettes in neighboring states that have lower cigarette taxes.
Lipsman says 246.3 million packs of cigarettes were sold in Iowa last year - a figure he expects to drop to 190.5 million this year and to 186.6 million in 2008.
"All the information we've gotten is that virtually everything that we thought would happen has happened," says Chuck Reed of the American Cancer Society's Iowa chapter. "I think that just shows that people do want to quit smoking, and the tax has brought about a lot of that because it's very expensive now to buy a carton of cigarettes."
Bush Going Down with the SCHIP
A NY Times editorial spells out the misinformation that the White House is pushing to justify President Bush's vetoing of the SCHIP bill. Over the past decade, SCHIP has reduced, by one-third, the number of uninsured children in low income households a drop from 22 percent to 15 percent, according to a report by the Commonwealth Fund (report).
Trying to justify his ideologically driven veto of a bill to expand the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, President Bush and his staff have fired a barrage of misinformation about this valuable program. Before the House votes on whether to override the veto, all members — especially those from Mr. Bush’s party who say they are concerned about millions of uninsured children — must "look behind the rhetoric.
A couple of quotable statements from the editorial:
"The White House declined overtures to join in consultations while the bill was being framed, according to Senator Charles Grassley, a Republican sponsor. Like so many other things that Mr. Bush has gotten disastrously wrong, he’d already made up his mind and had no interest in listening to others’ arguments."
"Perhaps the most eye-catching argument from the president is that the vetoed bill would have allowed S-chip to cover children in families earning $83,000 a year. That claim hangs on the extremely flimsy thread that New York — where insurance and living costs are higher than in many other parts of the country — has proposed extending the eligibility level to 400 percent of poverty, or $82,600 for a family of four. As far as most states are concerned, the bill would discourage covering such children, by allowing the enhanced S-chip match only up to 300 percent of the poverty level."
Though the program officially expired on Sept. 30, emergency funds currently allow the program to continue at least for the time being.
Trying to justify his ideologically driven veto of a bill to expand the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, President Bush and his staff have fired a barrage of misinformation about this valuable program. Before the House votes on whether to override the veto, all members — especially those from Mr. Bush’s party who say they are concerned about millions of uninsured children — must "look behind the rhetoric.
A couple of quotable statements from the editorial:
"The White House declined overtures to join in consultations while the bill was being framed, according to Senator Charles Grassley, a Republican sponsor. Like so many other things that Mr. Bush has gotten disastrously wrong, he’d already made up his mind and had no interest in listening to others’ arguments."
"Perhaps the most eye-catching argument from the president is that the vetoed bill would have allowed S-chip to cover children in families earning $83,000 a year. That claim hangs on the extremely flimsy thread that New York — where insurance and living costs are higher than in many other parts of the country — has proposed extending the eligibility level to 400 percent of poverty, or $82,600 for a family of four. As far as most states are concerned, the bill would discourage covering such children, by allowing the enhanced S-chip match only up to 300 percent of the poverty level."
Though the program officially expired on Sept. 30, emergency funds currently allow the program to continue at least for the time being.
We Never Said We Were Fast
The State Department's mission statement reads: Create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.
Well here's where the rubber meets the road. After thousands of monks and other protesters were disbursed last week, over a thousand are being held by the military junta in Rangoon/Yangon. Communications to the outside world have been limited (Background story)
US Charge d'Affaires Shari Villarosa (bio) is in Burma to hold talks with ruling generals today as the junta made a heavily qualified offer to meet elected democratic leader Aung San Suu Kyi after its crackdown on protests. Aung San Suu Kyi, whose NDL party won 1990 elections by a landslide but was never allowed to rule, has spent 18 years confined to her lakeside home in the main city Rangoon.
The Australian Herald Sun reports
The envoy was invited by the Government to its remote capital Naypyidaw but has not been told who she would be meeting with, US officials said.
US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said she would pass on a “very clear message” to the generals to start “meaningful” dialogue with opposition groups.
The unexpected, rare invitation was announced hours after state television said junta leader Senior General Than Shwe had offered to meet personally with Aung San Suu Kyi.
He told UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari earlier this week that he would meet with the detained Nobel Peace Prize winner – but only if she drops her stance of “confrontation” and ends support for sanctions on the country.
Observers said the conditions attached to the offer meant there was only a remote possibility that talks would actually take place.
“It's not enough to play diplomatic games,” said Dave Mathieson, a Burma consultant for Human Rights Watch.
“They have to do something substantial to prove that they're serious about it. The first step would be to let her out of house arrest straight away.”
Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party today said she would consider “in a positive light” an offer to meet with the regime leader and it was up to her whether to accept.
NLD spokesman Nyan Win also said about 200 party members had been arrested in the ongoing crackdown following the mass protests.
“I think Daw (Ms) Aung San Suu Kyi will consider these things in a positive light,” said Nyan Win.
“It's up to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to decide.”
He reiterated the long-standing demand for the junta to free her from house arrest.
Well here's where the rubber meets the road. After thousands of monks and other protesters were disbursed last week, over a thousand are being held by the military junta in Rangoon/Yangon. Communications to the outside world have been limited (Background story)
US Charge d'Affaires Shari Villarosa (bio) is in Burma to hold talks with ruling generals today as the junta made a heavily qualified offer to meet elected democratic leader Aung San Suu Kyi after its crackdown on protests. Aung San Suu Kyi, whose NDL party won 1990 elections by a landslide but was never allowed to rule, has spent 18 years confined to her lakeside home in the main city Rangoon.
The Australian Herald Sun reports
The envoy was invited by the Government to its remote capital Naypyidaw but has not been told who she would be meeting with, US officials said.
US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said she would pass on a “very clear message” to the generals to start “meaningful” dialogue with opposition groups.
The unexpected, rare invitation was announced hours after state television said junta leader Senior General Than Shwe had offered to meet personally with Aung San Suu Kyi.
He told UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari earlier this week that he would meet with the detained Nobel Peace Prize winner – but only if she drops her stance of “confrontation” and ends support for sanctions on the country.
Observers said the conditions attached to the offer meant there was only a remote possibility that talks would actually take place.
“It's not enough to play diplomatic games,” said Dave Mathieson, a Burma consultant for Human Rights Watch.
“They have to do something substantial to prove that they're serious about it. The first step would be to let her out of house arrest straight away.”
Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party today said she would consider “in a positive light” an offer to meet with the regime leader and it was up to her whether to accept.
NLD spokesman Nyan Win also said about 200 party members had been arrested in the ongoing crackdown following the mass protests.
“I think Daw (Ms) Aung San Suu Kyi will consider these things in a positive light,” said Nyan Win.
“It's up to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to decide.”
He reiterated the long-standing demand for the junta to free her from house arrest.
The Vigil Continues
As has been the Iowa City tradition since the war in Iraq began, there is a vigil on the corner of Clinton and Washington Streets from 5:15 to 5:45 pm. As of late, there has been the addition of UI Antiwar members who have widen the protest to include the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. As you can imagine, this creates some confusion and concern from the core group who is conflicted about that situation.
On the other hand, if it is about bringing peace to the world, we can't ignore places that our government has been so intimate in arming, whether it is in the Middle East, Myanmar, Darfur, Columbia, or anywhere else.
In any case, if you have been a "honker" who has supported the protest from the comfort of your car, consider parking and join us for a few minutes. It is an interesting and dedicated group. We have plenty of signs, so come as you are.
The road to peace is lined not by politicians, but by people who believe in the prospect of peace. Are you a person who believes in this prospect? Then join us. If you believe we are howling into the wind, it is always a distinct possibility that the wind can change directions.
On the other hand, if it is about bringing peace to the world, we can't ignore places that our government has been so intimate in arming, whether it is in the Middle East, Myanmar, Darfur, Columbia, or anywhere else.
In any case, if you have been a "honker" who has supported the protest from the comfort of your car, consider parking and join us for a few minutes. It is an interesting and dedicated group. We have plenty of signs, so come as you are.
The road to peace is lined not by politicians, but by people who believe in the prospect of peace. Are you a person who believes in this prospect? Then join us. If you believe we are howling into the wind, it is always a distinct possibility that the wind can change directions.
Thursday, October 4
Sen. Craig: Flip-Flopper
CNN reports that Idaho Senator Larry Craig is not resigning after all. Now where are those flip-flops...
Sen. Larry Craig on Thursday said he was not resigning from the Senate despite a Minnesota judge denying his request to withdraw his guilty plea stemming from his arrest in a sex sting at an airport men's room.
Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, sought to withdraw his guilty plea stemming from a sex sting in an airport restroom.
"I am extremely disappointed with the ruling issued today," Craig said in a statement. "I am innocent of the charges against me. I continue to work with my legal team to explore my additional legal options."
"I will continue to serve Idaho in the United States Senate, and there are several reasons for that," the Republican said.
Hennepin County District Judge Charles Porter found that Craig had entered the guilty plea to to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge "accurately, voluntarily and intelligently," and that it was too late to withdraw his admission.
In a sharply worded 27-page order, the judge found that Craig had freely given his plea after extensive discussions with prosecutors and after waiving his right to an attorney.
"The defendant, a career politician with a college education, is of at least above-average intelligence," Porter wrote. "He knew what he was saying, reading and signing." Watch a report on the judge's ruling »
Sen. Larry Craig on Thursday said he was not resigning from the Senate despite a Minnesota judge denying his request to withdraw his guilty plea stemming from his arrest in a sex sting at an airport men's room.
Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, sought to withdraw his guilty plea stemming from a sex sting in an airport restroom.
"I am extremely disappointed with the ruling issued today," Craig said in a statement. "I am innocent of the charges against me. I continue to work with my legal team to explore my additional legal options."
"I will continue to serve Idaho in the United States Senate, and there are several reasons for that," the Republican said.
Hennepin County District Judge Charles Porter found that Craig had entered the guilty plea to to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge "accurately, voluntarily and intelligently," and that it was too late to withdraw his admission.
In a sharply worded 27-page order, the judge found that Craig had freely given his plea after extensive discussions with prosecutors and after waiving his right to an attorney.
"The defendant, a career politician with a college education, is of at least above-average intelligence," Porter wrote. "He knew what he was saying, reading and signing." Watch a report on the judge's ruling »
Loebsack on Bush's Child Healthcare Veto
Well, he did it. By vetoing this overwhelmingly bipartisan legislation, President Bush chose to put the future of health care coverage for millions of children in jeopardy.
Providing health care to our children must be a priority. Iowa's SCHIP, HAWK-I program provides health benefits, including doctor's visits, vaccinations, prescription drugs and other critical services, to over 37,000 lower-income children.
With the health, well-being, and future of our children at stake, President Bush has shown utter disregard for the needs of hardworking, tax-paying, lower-income American families. There is no question that the health care system in America is broken, and the majority of Americans feel strongly that we must fix it as a matter of priority.
No child should go without regular checkups, preventive care, and proper treatment.
I will not sit back and let the President's misguided veto endanger the HAWK-I program or the health of Iowa's children. I will continue to work hard with my colleagues to bring together both Democrats and Republicans to stand up to President Bush and overturn his veto.
Congressman Dave Loebsack
Providing health care to our children must be a priority. Iowa's SCHIP, HAWK-I program provides health benefits, including doctor's visits, vaccinations, prescription drugs and other critical services, to over 37,000 lower-income children.
With the health, well-being, and future of our children at stake, President Bush has shown utter disregard for the needs of hardworking, tax-paying, lower-income American families. There is no question that the health care system in America is broken, and the majority of Americans feel strongly that we must fix it as a matter of priority.
No child should go without regular checkups, preventive care, and proper treatment.
I will not sit back and let the President's misguided veto endanger the HAWK-I program or the health of Iowa's children. I will continue to work hard with my colleagues to bring together both Democrats and Republicans to stand up to President Bush and overturn his veto.
Congressman Dave Loebsack
A Way for the Republicans to Jumpstart Their 2008 Hopes?
The Polish Women's Party has released a campaign ad that shows their candidates nude (albeit strategically covered). Perhaps the party of Lincoln might try something similar to breath life into what appears to be a Bob Dole year of campaigning.
Life as Artifice: Ask Chris Matthews
Why Politics and Punditry are Soulmates and Why neither approaches most people's lives.
Richardson Says "Out Now"
Reuters reports:
Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson criticized his rivals on Thursday for failing to support an immediate and complete U.S. troop pullout from Iraq, saying it is time to "get all our troops out now."
In prepared remarks for a speech at Georgetown University, Richardson said Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards all have taken a wait-and-see attitude about when to draw down U.S. troops.
"I say there has been enough waiting and seeing," he said. "If you haven't seen enough to know that we need to get all the troops out, then you aren't watching the same war that I and the rest of America are seeing."
The three leading Democratic presidential contenders -- Clinton, Obama and Edwards -- all call for withdrawing troops from Iraq.
He also proposed cuts of $57 billion in "unnecessary Pentagon spending" and said he would stop construction of new nuclear weapons.
Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson criticized his rivals on Thursday for failing to support an immediate and complete U.S. troop pullout from Iraq, saying it is time to "get all our troops out now."
In prepared remarks for a speech at Georgetown University, Richardson said Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards all have taken a wait-and-see attitude about when to draw down U.S. troops.
"I say there has been enough waiting and seeing," he said. "If you haven't seen enough to know that we need to get all the troops out, then you aren't watching the same war that I and the rest of America are seeing."
The three leading Democratic presidential contenders -- Clinton, Obama and Edwards -- all call for withdrawing troops from Iraq.
He also proposed cuts of $57 billion in "unnecessary Pentagon spending" and said he would stop construction of new nuclear weapons.
Bizarre Campaign Supporter Sighting: Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
7:04 am - Eastern Iowa Airport
1990 decrepit, white Chevy van plastered with 6 or 8 Fred Thompson '08 bumperstickers. A middle-aged plump woman steps out of the van wearing a Fred T. t-shirt. Her grizzled husband follows, he's wearing classic AC/DC t-shirt. Headbangers for Fred Thompson? I'm on the highway to hell...
1990 decrepit, white Chevy van plastered with 6 or 8 Fred Thompson '08 bumperstickers. A middle-aged plump woman steps out of the van wearing a Fred T. t-shirt. Her grizzled husband follows, he's wearing classic AC/DC t-shirt. Headbangers for Fred Thompson? I'm on the highway to hell...
It Ain't Corning, But a Tip o' the Hat
The other day I noted that the teeming metropolis of Corning, Iowa has not been visited by any candidates running for president. And this is still true. But check this out.
John Edwards will visit the small Kentucky hamlet of Columbus. Population: 229
Columbus residents won an online competition to have Edwards visit their town, which is an ideal location for the North Carolina Democrat to discuss his agenda for rural America as he seeks his party’s presidential nomination.
"I grew up in a small rural town, so I've seen first-hand how the problems of rural America too often are forgotten by politicians living and working in far-off capital cities," Edwards said in a statement.
Today Columbus, tomorrow Corning?
John Edwards will visit the small Kentucky hamlet of Columbus. Population: 229
Columbus residents won an online competition to have Edwards visit their town, which is an ideal location for the North Carolina Democrat to discuss his agenda for rural America as he seeks his party’s presidential nomination.
"I grew up in a small rural town, so I've seen first-hand how the problems of rural America too often are forgotten by politicians living and working in far-off capital cities," Edwards said in a statement.
Today Columbus, tomorrow Corning?
Carter Denied Access to Refugees in Darfur
From the AP:
Former President Jimmy Carter confronted Sudanese security services on a visit to Darfur Wednesday, shouting "You don't have the power to stop me!" at some who blocked him from meeting refugees of the conflict.
The 83-year-old Carter wanted to visit a refugee camp in South Darfur but the U.N. mission in Sudan deemed that too dangerous. Instead, he agreed to fly to the World Food Program compound in the North Darfur town of Kabkabiya, where he was supposed to meet with refugees, many of whom were chased from their homes by militias and government forces.
But none of the refugees showed up and Carter decided to walk into the town, a volatile stronghold of the pro-government janjaweed militia, to meet refugees too frightened to attend the meeting at the compound.
He was able to make it to a school where he met with one tribal representative and was preparing to go further into town when Sudanese security officers stopped him.
"You can't go. It's not on the program!" the local security chief, who only gave his first name as Omar, yelled at Carter, who is in Darfur as part of a delegation of respected international figures known as "The Elders."
"We're going to anyway!" an angry Carter retorted as a crowd began to gather. "You don't have the power to stop me."
However, U.N. officials told Carter's entourage the Sudanese state police could bar his way. Carter's traveling companions, billionaire businessman Richard Branson and Graca Machel, the wife of former South African President Nelson Mandela, tried to ease his frustration and his Secret Service detail urged him to get into a car and leave.
"I'll tell President Bashir about this," Carter said, referring to Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.
Omar, the security chief, said Carter had already breached security once by walking to the school and would not be allowed to breach security again.
"We are in the security field. We're not that flexible," he said after the confrontation ended.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Carter later played down the encounter, saying the security chief was only doing his job.
"But it's true that I'm not accustomed to people telling me I can't walk down the street and meet people," he told the AP after returning to a United Nations compound in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur state.
Branson said some refugees had slipped notes in his pockets.
"We (are) still suffering from the war as our girls are being raped on a daily basis," read one of the notes, translated from Arabic, that Branson handed to the AP.
Former President Jimmy Carter confronted Sudanese security services on a visit to Darfur Wednesday, shouting "You don't have the power to stop me!" at some who blocked him from meeting refugees of the conflict.
The 83-year-old Carter wanted to visit a refugee camp in South Darfur but the U.N. mission in Sudan deemed that too dangerous. Instead, he agreed to fly to the World Food Program compound in the North Darfur town of Kabkabiya, where he was supposed to meet with refugees, many of whom were chased from their homes by militias and government forces.
But none of the refugees showed up and Carter decided to walk into the town, a volatile stronghold of the pro-government janjaweed militia, to meet refugees too frightened to attend the meeting at the compound.
He was able to make it to a school where he met with one tribal representative and was preparing to go further into town when Sudanese security officers stopped him.
"You can't go. It's not on the program!" the local security chief, who only gave his first name as Omar, yelled at Carter, who is in Darfur as part of a delegation of respected international figures known as "The Elders."
"We're going to anyway!" an angry Carter retorted as a crowd began to gather. "You don't have the power to stop me."
However, U.N. officials told Carter's entourage the Sudanese state police could bar his way. Carter's traveling companions, billionaire businessman Richard Branson and Graca Machel, the wife of former South African President Nelson Mandela, tried to ease his frustration and his Secret Service detail urged him to get into a car and leave.
"I'll tell President Bashir about this," Carter said, referring to Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.
Omar, the security chief, said Carter had already breached security once by walking to the school and would not be allowed to breach security again.
"We are in the security field. We're not that flexible," he said after the confrontation ended.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Carter later played down the encounter, saying the security chief was only doing his job.
"But it's true that I'm not accustomed to people telling me I can't walk down the street and meet people," he told the AP after returning to a United Nations compound in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur state.
Branson said some refugees had slipped notes in his pockets.
"We (are) still suffering from the war as our girls are being raped on a daily basis," read one of the notes, translated from Arabic, that Branson handed to the AP.
Hot and Saucy
Actually I wad describing the Johnson County Democrats BBQ this Saturday 10/6 from 4:00 to 8:00 pm at the Johnson County Fairgrounds where, for a "suggested donation" of $15 per person or $30 per family, you can rub elbows with CHRIS DODD, BILL RICHARDSON, HILLARY CLINTON, JOHN EDWARDS, DENNIS KUCINICH, and stunt double Forest Whitaker, speaking for BARACK OBAMA. Congressman DAVE LOEBSACK will be tap dancing as he plays host to all.
As always, there will be surprise guests and perhaps an endorsement or two.
As always, there will be surprise guests and perhaps an endorsement or two.
Wednesday, October 3
To Franchise or Not to Franchise
Iowa City has been without a contracted franchise agreement with MidAmerican Energy for six years. Do we need one, given that MidAmerican by law has to provide it anyway and it seems to work fine? On the other hand, is it fair to expect a company to upgrade services without a reasonable commitment? The jury is out.
The Gazette Reports
Locals packed the City Council meeting room here last night to question how a franchise agreement with MidAmerican Energy Co. would benefit Iowa City.
"When I look at the six-page franchise agreement, I ask, 'Where's the beef,' '' said Peter Hansen, a University of Iowa professor. "I don't see that many benefits to the city.''
The council's public hearing centered on two ordinances that would grant MidAmerican Energy electric and natural gas franchises for at least 10 years.
The city could renew the franchises for 10-year and 5-year increments, up to 25 years.
Those opposed focused on how the city has fared just fine without a franchise for six years, and expressed concern the agreement would smother the city's opportunities to pursue renewable and alternative energy sources.
The Gazette Reports
Locals packed the City Council meeting room here last night to question how a franchise agreement with MidAmerican Energy Co. would benefit Iowa City.
"When I look at the six-page franchise agreement, I ask, 'Where's the beef,' '' said Peter Hansen, a University of Iowa professor. "I don't see that many benefits to the city.''
The council's public hearing centered on two ordinances that would grant MidAmerican Energy electric and natural gas franchises for at least 10 years.
The city could renew the franchises for 10-year and 5-year increments, up to 25 years.
Those opposed focused on how the city has fared just fine without a franchise for six years, and expressed concern the agreement would smother the city's opportunities to pursue renewable and alternative energy sources.
Press Citizen Makes Endorsements for City Council
The Press-Citizen's Editorial Board said "we don't think voters can go wrong by choosing from three of the five candidates Tuesday": Matt Hayek, Michael Wright and Terry Smith.
Actually, they chose Matt Hayek unanimously and offered a "tie" between one of my choices, Mike Wright, and Terry Smith. Support for incumbent Dee Vanderhoef and my other choice, Brandon Ross? Not so much. Fortunately for all the candidates, as I have learned first-hand, endorsements do not equal votes--so go out and vote. You can do so at Johnson County Administrative building today if you choose.
Actually, they chose Matt Hayek unanimously and offered a "tie" between one of my choices, Mike Wright, and Terry Smith. Support for incumbent Dee Vanderhoef and my other choice, Brandon Ross? Not so much. Fortunately for all the candidates, as I have learned first-hand, endorsements do not equal votes--so go out and vote. You can do so at Johnson County Administrative building today if you choose.
Tuesday, October 2
In War, There Are No Good Months
News agencies report that deaths to both troops and civilians fell in Iraq last month to the lowest level since July of 2006. As a person who works with statistics it is important to say, one month does not a trend make. However, fewer deaths are good news for the families of soldiers and Iraqis alike..
The BBC reports
Figures show reduction of violence, but it is unclear how long it will last
The number of Iraqi civilians killed per month in bombings and shootings has fallen to the lowest level this year, the Iraqi government says.
In September, 884 civilians were killed by violence, less than half the figure for August, the government said.
The BBC's Jon Brain in Baghdad says the figures suggest the so-called surge involving 30,000 extra US troops is having some success.
September also saw the lowest number of US troops killed for more than a year.
SEPTEMBER TOLL
884 civilian deaths
78 Iraqi soldiers and police killed
62 US military deaths
Source: Iraqi government
Iraq violence in figures
However, our correspondent says, the political situation remains deadlocked and there are fears that when the extra troops are withdrawn the violence will escalate again.
The NY Times reports
According to a CNN count, there have been 4,101 coalition deaths in Iraq -- 3,801 Americans, two Australians, 170 Britons, 13 Bulgarians, one Czech, seven Danes, two Dutch, two Estonians, one Fijian, one Hungarian, 33 Italians, one Kazakh, one Korean, three Latvians, 21 Poles, two Romanians, five Salvadoran, four Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and 18 Ukrainians -- in the war in Iraq as of Friday. At least 28,009 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon.
There have been 692 coalition deaths in Afghanistan -- 441 Americans, one Australian, 81 Britons, 70 Canadians, one Czech, four Danes, 10 Dutch, two Estonians, one Finn, 11 French, 25 Germans, nine Italians, two Norwegians, one Pole, one Portuguese, four Romanians, one South Korean, 23 Spaniards, two Swedes -- in the war on terror, also as of Friday. The troops died in support of the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom or were part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. At least 1,607 U.S. personnel have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon.
The BBC reports
Figures show reduction of violence, but it is unclear how long it will last
The number of Iraqi civilians killed per month in bombings and shootings has fallen to the lowest level this year, the Iraqi government says.
In September, 884 civilians were killed by violence, less than half the figure for August, the government said.
The BBC's Jon Brain in Baghdad says the figures suggest the so-called surge involving 30,000 extra US troops is having some success.
September also saw the lowest number of US troops killed for more than a year.
SEPTEMBER TOLL
884 civilian deaths
78 Iraqi soldiers and police killed
62 US military deaths
Source: Iraqi government
Iraq violence in figures
However, our correspondent says, the political situation remains deadlocked and there are fears that when the extra troops are withdrawn the violence will escalate again.
The NY Times reports
According to a CNN count, there have been 4,101 coalition deaths in Iraq -- 3,801 Americans, two Australians, 170 Britons, 13 Bulgarians, one Czech, seven Danes, two Dutch, two Estonians, one Fijian, one Hungarian, 33 Italians, one Kazakh, one Korean, three Latvians, 21 Poles, two Romanians, five Salvadoran, four Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and 18 Ukrainians -- in the war in Iraq as of Friday. At least 28,009 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon.
There have been 692 coalition deaths in Afghanistan -- 441 Americans, one Australian, 81 Britons, 70 Canadians, one Czech, four Danes, 10 Dutch, two Estonians, one Finn, 11 French, 25 Germans, nine Italians, two Norwegians, one Pole, one Portuguese, four Romanians, one South Korean, 23 Spaniards, two Swedes -- in the war on terror, also as of Friday. The troops died in support of the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom or were part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. At least 1,607 U.S. personnel have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon.
Clinton Supported Kyl/Lieberman Amendment
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/104420.html
U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was the lone Democratic presidential candidate to support a Senate amendment that described Iran's Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist entity.
The non-binding amendment to the Defense Authorization Act, initiated by U.S. Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Kyl (R-Ariz.), passed Sept. 26 by a vote of 76-22. It said the Revolutionary Guards was responsible for some of the insurgent attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and urged the Bush administration to name the group as a terrorist entity, a designation that would severely restrict the Guards to function in world markets. Bush is believed to be considering such a designation; it would be the first time the label has been applied to a wing of the armed forces of a sovereign nation.
In order to gain an overwhelming majority, Lieberman agreed to remove two paragraphs from the amendment's original language that called for a U.S. policy to "combat, contain and roll back" the Guards inside Iraq and to "support the prudent and calibrated use of instruments of United States national power in Iraq" to do so. Democrats felt that language came too close to endorsing war, even in a non-binding amendment.
The change won the support of Clinton (D-N.Y.), a front-runner in the race for her party's presidential candidacy. Two other Democratic presidential candidates voted against it: Sens. Joe Biden (D-Del.) and Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was absent from the vote, but later said he would have voted against it.
Clinton came under fire at a Sept. 26 debate for her vote from other candidates, including former senators Mike Gravel of Alaska and John Edwards of North Carolina and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio).
"I have no intention of giving George Bush the authority to take the first step on a road to war with Iran," Edwards said, commending Biden and Dodd for their votes against the amendment.
U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was the lone Democratic presidential candidate to support a Senate amendment that described Iran's Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist entity.
The non-binding amendment to the Defense Authorization Act, initiated by U.S. Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Kyl (R-Ariz.), passed Sept. 26 by a vote of 76-22. It said the Revolutionary Guards was responsible for some of the insurgent attacks against U.S.-led forces in Iraq and urged the Bush administration to name the group as a terrorist entity, a designation that would severely restrict the Guards to function in world markets. Bush is believed to be considering such a designation; it would be the first time the label has been applied to a wing of the armed forces of a sovereign nation.
In order to gain an overwhelming majority, Lieberman agreed to remove two paragraphs from the amendment's original language that called for a U.S. policy to "combat, contain and roll back" the Guards inside Iraq and to "support the prudent and calibrated use of instruments of United States national power in Iraq" to do so. Democrats felt that language came too close to endorsing war, even in a non-binding amendment.
The change won the support of Clinton (D-N.Y.), a front-runner in the race for her party's presidential candidacy. Two other Democratic presidential candidates voted against it: Sens. Joe Biden (D-Del.) and Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was absent from the vote, but later said he would have voted against it.
Clinton came under fire at a Sept. 26 debate for her vote from other candidates, including former senators Mike Gravel of Alaska and John Edwards of North Carolina and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio).
"I have no intention of giving George Bush the authority to take the first step on a road to war with Iran," Edwards said, commending Biden and Dodd for their votes against the amendment.
Monday, October 1
Edwards Stronger Head to Head Against Republicans
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008_edwards_vs_giuliani_and_thompson
Former Senator John Edwards now attracts 50% support in the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey matching him with former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani. He leads Giuliani 50% to 41%. The poll also shows Edwards with a ten-point advantage over former Senator Fred Thompson, 49% to 39%.
One interesting twist to this year’s early Presidential polling is that Edwards typically outperforms other leading Democratic hopefuls in general election match-ups but remains a distant third in the competition for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. This seems to have impaired his fundraising and Edwards recently decided to accept public funding. The move subjects his campaign to strict spending limits that many political observers believe will handicap his efforts.
Still, Edwards currently leads the top four Republican candidates by an average of nearly nine points.
Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton leads the top GOP hopefuls by an average of six points while Barack Obama holds an average lead of five points (see a summary of general election match-ups and other key stats for all Democratic and Republican candidates).
Former Senator John Edwards now attracts 50% support in the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey matching him with former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani. He leads Giuliani 50% to 41%. The poll also shows Edwards with a ten-point advantage over former Senator Fred Thompson, 49% to 39%.
One interesting twist to this year’s early Presidential polling is that Edwards typically outperforms other leading Democratic hopefuls in general election match-ups but remains a distant third in the competition for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. This seems to have impaired his fundraising and Edwards recently decided to accept public funding. The move subjects his campaign to strict spending limits that many political observers believe will handicap his efforts.
Still, Edwards currently leads the top four Republican candidates by an average of nearly nine points.
Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton leads the top GOP hopefuls by an average of six points while Barack Obama holds an average lead of five points (see a summary of general election match-ups and other key stats for all Democratic and Republican candidates).
Obama in Coralville: Change of Venue
From Simeon Talley from the Obama '08 Campaign
Turn the Page in Iraq Rally with Barack Obama
Tuesday, October 2nd
Doors open at 6:45pm
Coralville Marriott Hotel & Conference Center
Oakdale Ballroom
300 East 9th St., Coralville, IA
To RSVP call 319-351-2450
On Tuesday, October 2nd, Senator Barack Obama will deliver a speech highlighting the experience and judgment he used to oppose the war before it started and his vision to restore America’s security and standing in the world.
During his October 2002 speech, Obama spoke out against President Bush’s plan to invade Iraq saying it would lead to “a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.” Less than two weeks later, the US Congress voted to authorize President Bush to go to war with Iraq.
Two weeks ago, Obama outlined a comprehensive plan to end the war in Iraq responsibly in a September 12th speech in Clinton, IA.
This event is free and open to the public.
Turn the Page in Iraq Rally with Barack Obama
Tuesday, October 2nd
Doors open at 6:45pm
Coralville Marriott Hotel & Conference Center
Oakdale Ballroom
300 East 9th St., Coralville, IA
To RSVP call 319-351-2450
On Tuesday, October 2nd, Senator Barack Obama will deliver a speech highlighting the experience and judgment he used to oppose the war before it started and his vision to restore America’s security and standing in the world.
During his October 2002 speech, Obama spoke out against President Bush’s plan to invade Iraq saying it would lead to “a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.” Less than two weeks later, the US Congress voted to authorize President Bush to go to war with Iraq.
Two weeks ago, Obama outlined a comprehensive plan to end the war in Iraq responsibly in a September 12th speech in Clinton, IA.
This event is free and open to the public.
Edwards Strategy: Win Early and Often
According to the Chicago Tribune, John Edwards is playing a political version of "You Bet Your Life" in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Unable to match Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in fundraising, Edwards has placed all his chips on the only bet available to him: a full-scale, grass-roots push in the two earliest primary states in hopes that success there will vault him to the nomination.
Rivals call it a long shot, particularly because Edwards' decision last week to accept federal matching funds will limit how much he can spend in any given state. But the former North Carolina senator and his campaign say they have the cash, the message and, above all, the right kind of electoral calendar to pull it off.
Edwards' strategy contrasts with that of Obama, who has begun to hire campaign staff in California, Missouri and other states that vote in early February.
Obama and Edwards are vying to be the chief Democratic alternative to Clinton, who leads the field in national polls. Their competing strategies reflect their competing strengths as candidates -- and different predictions of how the most compressed primary schedule in presidential history will affect the nomination battle.
Regardless of the strategies employed by the candidates, what is true is that voters, particularly national voters, tune in as the early caucuses begin. As has been seen time and again, where people are in October does not reliably prediction of where they will be in January and beyond.
Unable to match Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in fundraising, Edwards has placed all his chips on the only bet available to him: a full-scale, grass-roots push in the two earliest primary states in hopes that success there will vault him to the nomination.
Rivals call it a long shot, particularly because Edwards' decision last week to accept federal matching funds will limit how much he can spend in any given state. But the former North Carolina senator and his campaign say they have the cash, the message and, above all, the right kind of electoral calendar to pull it off.
Edwards' strategy contrasts with that of Obama, who has begun to hire campaign staff in California, Missouri and other states that vote in early February.
Obama and Edwards are vying to be the chief Democratic alternative to Clinton, who leads the field in national polls. Their competing strategies reflect their competing strengths as candidates -- and different predictions of how the most compressed primary schedule in presidential history will affect the nomination battle.
Regardless of the strategies employed by the candidates, what is true is that voters, particularly national voters, tune in as the early caucuses begin. As has been seen time and again, where people are in October does not reliably prediction of where they will be in January and beyond.
Scorning Corning
As Corning goes, so goes Iowa? In the southwest corner of Iowa in Adams county is the bucolic county seat, Corning that has a population of 1783 and a median age of 42.3. USA Today reports that the candidates of both parties have not made a stop there, but have been courting them electronically, by phone and via the Internet.
But is that enough? The article says"Ken Mallas, a retired school superintendent and former county GOP chairman, says candidates should heed the lessons of Jimmy Carter's 1976 campaign. 'He came to Corning and to all the rural communities," Mallas says. "He won the Iowa caucuses. You shouldn't ignore the small towns.'"
Given the close race in Iowa between Clinton, Obama, and Edwards, it would seem to be an important stop--who will drop by first?
But is that enough? The article says"Ken Mallas, a retired school superintendent and former county GOP chairman, says candidates should heed the lessons of Jimmy Carter's 1976 campaign. 'He came to Corning and to all the rural communities," Mallas says. "He won the Iowa caucuses. You shouldn't ignore the small towns.'"
Given the close race in Iowa between Clinton, Obama, and Edwards, it would seem to be an important stop--who will drop by first?
Does the US know best?
A resoultion that was passed in the US senate last week is not meeting with approval of the Iraqi government. From TPM
The Senate resolution, adopted last week, proposed reshaping Iraq according to three sectarian or ethnic territories. It calls for a limited central government with the bulk of power going to the country's Shiite, Sunni or Kurdish regions, envisioning a power-sharing agreement similar to the one that ended the 1990s war in Bosnia. Senator Joseph Biden, a Democratic presidential candidate, was a prime sponsor.
At a news conference earlier, at least nine Iraqi political parties and party blocs _ both Shiite and Sunni _ said the Senate resolution would diminish Iraq's sovereignty and said they would try to pass a law to ban any division of the country.
"This proposal was based on the incorrect reading and unrealistic estimations of Iraq's past, present and future," according to a statement read at a news conference by Izzat al-Shahbandar, a representative of the secular Iraqi National List.
The Senate resolution, adopted last week, proposed reshaping Iraq according to three sectarian or ethnic territories. It calls for a limited central government with the bulk of power going to the country's Shiite, Sunni or Kurdish regions, envisioning a power-sharing agreement similar to the one that ended the 1990s war in Bosnia. Senator Joseph Biden, a Democratic presidential candidate, was a prime sponsor.
At a news conference earlier, at least nine Iraqi political parties and party blocs _ both Shiite and Sunni _ said the Senate resolution would diminish Iraq's sovereignty and said they would try to pass a law to ban any division of the country.
"This proposal was based on the incorrect reading and unrealistic estimations of Iraq's past, present and future," according to a statement read at a news conference by Izzat al-Shahbandar, a representative of the secular Iraqi National List.
Lynn Heuss from VOICE
Lynn Heuss and Ed Fallon are advocates for clean election laws (In Iowa, Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections [VOICE]). Lynn writes:
This week four of us were privileged to have dinner with former Congressman, Dr. Bob Edgar. He was named President and CEO of Common Cause in May 2007. Common Cause is a nonpartisan nonprofit advocacy organization. The group is committed to honest, open and accountable government, as well as encouraging citizen participation in democracy.
Bob was elected to the US House in 1974, the first Democrat in 82 years in his district. He ran unsuccessfully for the US Senate in 1986 against Arlen Specter. That race fueled his frustration with the undue influence of money in politics and he became an active supporter of clean elections and campaign finance reform, issues that have be en Common Cause's hallmark.
Our dinner conversation centered around politics, obviously. Much of the talk was about VOICE (Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections) legislation, since he was in Des Moines to address that subject and the federal equivalent offered by senators Durbin and Specter.
At one point the conversation moved to presidential politics and how many candidates are framing their message around “Change” and “Hope.” Bob admitted that it’s a positive way to frame a message, but he also pointed out the need to address the culture of fear that has grown more prevalent in recent years. “What if,” he said, “one of the presidential candidates said, ‘I’m not afraid of terrorists. I’m not afraid of our healthcare crisis. I’m not afraid of the global warming crisis.’?”
Clearly, Bob did not mean statements like these should be made out of hubris, or pretension, or especially to give a false sense of security. His point was that we don’t need to be afraid, and it’s time for our leaders to say it out loud! Too many times fear is used by politicians to either paralyze us into inaction or to convince us of the need for violent action. What it should do is mobilize us into positive action for the common good.
Yes, there are very serious issues that need to be confronted: our broken relationships with leaders of many nations, the Iraq War, the healthcare crisis, global warming, the growing gap between America’s rich and poor, a shrinking middle class, ending racism, fighting discrimination. Yes, these issues will require thoughtful solutions. But we’ve been mired in the slough of despair and fear for years, and we need to remember and re-learn how to think and act with hope and optimism.
There is every reason to have hope and to live without fear! It’s one of the reasons Ed and I support John Edwards. I know you hear this a lot through our updates, but we believe in him and what he can accomplish as President. John Edwards has spent his life and career fighting on behalf of people who have no voice, and that’s exactly what he’ll do as President.
In Iowa, we’ve got legislation pending by that very name, VOICE (Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections).Ed and I were very excited this week to learn about Senator Edwa rd’s decision to accept public financing for his campaign. He’s never taken money from PACs or Washington lobbyists and the public financing decision underscores this longstanding commitment to getting big money out of politics.
In our September 4th update, Ed wrote to encourage people to consider running for office and several of you are! We’ll be joining two who took the plunge, Molly Cantrell-Kraig of Muscatine, and Conner Anderson of Clinton, at fundraisers this weekend (see our website for details: www.imforiowa.org). We are excited that they, and others, are pursuing this avenue of service. We need leaders who have the strength of character to fight for the people, who can stand up to corporate interests.
But we know not everyone has the time, or inclination, to be an elected official. Fortunately, there is something for everyone to do and we’ll continue to share information about our growing network of grassroots efforts across the state. For now, here are a few:
• If you’re interested in campaign finance reform at the state level (VOICE) you can contact Adam Mason (CCI) at adam@iowacci.org.
• If you want to work for the federal clean elections bill (Durbin-Specter) you can contact Kyle Lobner (Common Cause) at KLobner@commoncause.org.
• Are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) the issue that’s most important to you? Please conta ct me at imforiowa@gmail.com.
• What about the abuse of eminent domain? There’s a new coalition formed and you can contact them at info@IowansForPropertyRights.com .
• If urban sprawl and the paving over of Iowa farmland are your concern, please contact Stephanie Weisenbach of 1000 Friends of Iowa at programs@1000friendsofiowa.org.
• Several groups we’re affiliated with work for an end to the Iraq War, so let us know if you’re interested in this issue and we’ll send you information on local contacts.
• Is an end to poverty the issue you’re passionate about? Along with John and Elizabeth Edwards’ OneCorps America (http://blog.johnedwards.com/onecorps), we know several additional groups throughout the state and we can try to put you in touch with local activists.
Thanks for reading and please write to ask for additional resources if there's another issue you're interested in, or to share information about other activists and/or groups in your area fighting for the common good.Don’t be afraid of those who pander fear and please, take action to prove it!
Lynn Heuss
This week four of us were privileged to have dinner with former Congressman, Dr. Bob Edgar. He was named President and CEO of Common Cause in May 2007. Common Cause is a nonpartisan nonprofit advocacy organization. The group is committed to honest, open and accountable government, as well as encouraging citizen participation in democracy.
Bob was elected to the US House in 1974, the first Democrat in 82 years in his district. He ran unsuccessfully for the US Senate in 1986 against Arlen Specter. That race fueled his frustration with the undue influence of money in politics and he became an active supporter of clean elections and campaign finance reform, issues that have be en Common Cause's hallmark.
Our dinner conversation centered around politics, obviously. Much of the talk was about VOICE (Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections) legislation, since he was in Des Moines to address that subject and the federal equivalent offered by senators Durbin and Specter.
At one point the conversation moved to presidential politics and how many candidates are framing their message around “Change” and “Hope.” Bob admitted that it’s a positive way to frame a message, but he also pointed out the need to address the culture of fear that has grown more prevalent in recent years. “What if,” he said, “one of the presidential candidates said, ‘I’m not afraid of terrorists. I’m not afraid of our healthcare crisis. I’m not afraid of the global warming crisis.’?”
Clearly, Bob did not mean statements like these should be made out of hubris, or pretension, or especially to give a false sense of security. His point was that we don’t need to be afraid, and it’s time for our leaders to say it out loud! Too many times fear is used by politicians to either paralyze us into inaction or to convince us of the need for violent action. What it should do is mobilize us into positive action for the common good.
Yes, there are very serious issues that need to be confronted: our broken relationships with leaders of many nations, the Iraq War, the healthcare crisis, global warming, the growing gap between America’s rich and poor, a shrinking middle class, ending racism, fighting discrimination. Yes, these issues will require thoughtful solutions. But we’ve been mired in the slough of despair and fear for years, and we need to remember and re-learn how to think and act with hope and optimism.
There is every reason to have hope and to live without fear! It’s one of the reasons Ed and I support John Edwards. I know you hear this a lot through our updates, but we believe in him and what he can accomplish as President. John Edwards has spent his life and career fighting on behalf of people who have no voice, and that’s exactly what he’ll do as President.
In Iowa, we’ve got legislation pending by that very name, VOICE (Voter Owned Iowa Clean Elections).Ed and I were very excited this week to learn about Senator Edwa rd’s decision to accept public financing for his campaign. He’s never taken money from PACs or Washington lobbyists and the public financing decision underscores this longstanding commitment to getting big money out of politics.
In our September 4th update, Ed wrote to encourage people to consider running for office and several of you are! We’ll be joining two who took the plunge, Molly Cantrell-Kraig of Muscatine, and Conner Anderson of Clinton, at fundraisers this weekend (see our website for details: www.imforiowa.org). We are excited that they, and others, are pursuing this avenue of service. We need leaders who have the strength of character to fight for the people, who can stand up to corporate interests.
But we know not everyone has the time, or inclination, to be an elected official. Fortunately, there is something for everyone to do and we’ll continue to share information about our growing network of grassroots efforts across the state. For now, here are a few:
• If you’re interested in campaign finance reform at the state level (VOICE) you can contact Adam Mason (CCI) at adam@iowacci.org.
• If you want to work for the federal clean elections bill (Durbin-Specter) you can contact Kyle Lobner (Common Cause) at KLobner@commoncause.org.
• Are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) the issue that’s most important to you? Please conta ct me at imforiowa@gmail.com.
• What about the abuse of eminent domain? There’s a new coalition formed and you can contact them at info@IowansForPropertyRights.com .
• If urban sprawl and the paving over of Iowa farmland are your concern, please contact Stephanie Weisenbach of 1000 Friends of Iowa at programs@1000friendsofiowa.org.
• Several groups we’re affiliated with work for an end to the Iraq War, so let us know if you’re interested in this issue and we’ll send you information on local contacts.
• Is an end to poverty the issue you’re passionate about? Along with John and Elizabeth Edwards’ OneCorps America (http://blog.johnedwards.com/onecorps), we know several additional groups throughout the state and we can try to put you in touch with local activists.
Thanks for reading and please write to ask for additional resources if there's another issue you're interested in, or to share information about other activists and/or groups in your area fighting for the common good.Don’t be afraid of those who pander fear and please, take action to prove it!
Lynn Heuss
Clinton Cackles Raise Hackles
In the latest non-story of the 2008 campaign, Hillary Clinton's laugh is getting more press than Mike Gravel, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, and Dennis Kucinich combined. Certainly, Fox News, the Daily Show, and the NY Times have spent time and column inches dissecting the ramifications of it.
The implication is that Clinton is a) insensitive b) out of touch c) off-balance e) the Wicked Witch of the West e) all of the above.
Whether or not Clinton receives the nomination should be determined by what voters think of her policies, not her laugh. It seems a little schoolgirlish, even coming from the media.
The implication is that Clinton is a) insensitive b) out of touch c) off-balance e) the Wicked Witch of the West e) all of the above.
Whether or not Clinton receives the nomination should be determined by what voters think of her policies, not her laugh. It seems a little schoolgirlish, even coming from the media.
Newsweek Poll Puts Obama Ahead in Iowa
Baltimore Sun's The Swamp reports:
Barack Obama's presidential campaign has been telling people not to pay too much attention to the polls lately, but now they're emailing all their supporters with news of the latest survey.
In Iowa, Obama is actually leading Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and John Edwards among likely caucus-goers, according to a new Newsweek poll. Obama scores 28 percent in that poll while Clinton gets 24 percent and Edwards has 22 percent.
The overall numbers -- not specifically among voters who say they're "likely" to go to the caucuses -- are more favorable to Clinton. The poll also suggests that Clinton's supporters may be more solidly in her camp than are backers of the other Democrats, with a larger proportion of Clinton voters characterizing their support as "strong."
Saber Rattling: Iran in US Bombsights?
According to AFP the Bush administration has got plans on the table to "surgically" attack Iran:
The US administration has shifted strategy and is drawing up plans for possible air strikes against Iran's Revolutionary Guard instead of the country's nuclear sites, the New Yorker magazine reported on Sunday.
The US administration has shifted strategy and is drawing up plans for possible air strikes against Iran's Revolutionary Guard instead of the country's nuclear sites, the New Yorker magazine reported on Sunday.
President George W. Bush has requested the Joint Chiefs of Staff revise plans for a possible attack on Iran, with the focus on "surgical" raids against the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps which Washington accuses of targeting US forces in Iraq, the magazine wrote.
Previous contingency plans called for a more elaborate bombing campaign against suspected nuclear sites in Iran as well as other infrastructure, the magazine reported, citing unnamed former officials and government consultants.
The change in focus comes as Bush and his top aides have begun to describe the war in Iraq in public statements as increasingly a "strategic battle between the United States and Iran," said the article by investigative reporter Seymour Hersh.
During a video conference over the summer, Bush allegedly told Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Iraq, that he was considering striking Iranian targets across the border and that the British "were on board," according to the article.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)