Showing posts with label Tom Harkin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Harkin. Show all posts

Thursday, October 8

Jobless and Workers Getting Mixed Messages From Senate

With the benefits for Iowa's unemployed expiring, the US Senate continues to quibble over who should qualify for an extension of benefits. Here's a suggestion: everyone who is unemployed and actively seeking work or retraining.

The conflict over whether "high unemployment states" should be the only one's receiving Washington's largess, will be lost on every worker who is left out. The House didn't seem to have any problem seeing this logic, perhaps Senators need to get out more often.

At least one Senator seems to get it, Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., is planning to introduce a measure that would extend jobless benefits in all 50 states by 17 weeks.
"Distinctions in state unemployment rates may make sense in Washington, ... and they don't make sense to the 15 million unemployed workers nationwide who are struggling to get by and get back to work," said Shaheen.

Meanwhile The U.. Supreme Court has made a ruling regarding older workers that is likely to make it easier for employers to discard or demote them. The court raised the burden of proof for demonstrating age discrimination, ruling last term that a "mixed motive" including age as a factor was not strong enough evidence. Senators Tom Harkin and Pat Leahy are working with Rep. George Miller to pass legislation that would require employees to only prove that age had been a "motivating factor" in their termination or demotion.

According to the Wall Street Journal,

the Senate also addressed the effects of the court's opinion in Circuit City v. Adams, a 2001 decision that enlarged the reach of employees who are required to address disputes through arbitration rather than through the courts. At the hearing, Jamie Leigh Jones, who had worked for a former subsidiary of Halliburton (HAL), argued that arbitration can prevent important information from entering the public record. Jones said she was drugged and raped while working in Iraq in 2005 and has spent the past four years trying to get her case heard in court rather than in the arbitration she agreed to when she was hired.

"It's very apparent to me that corporations adopt arbitration as a way to wipe clean the record of disputes that arise," she said.

Sen. Al Franken offered an amendment to a defense bill that would restrict funding to contractors that require their employees to go through arbitration to settle sexual assault claims. In April, Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., introduced a broader bill seeking to invalidate many binding arbitration clauses and return consumer, employment and civil rights disputes to the courts.

When Mark de Bernardo, executive director of the Council for Employment Law Equity, defended the use of arbitration as a faster and cheaper alternative to litigation, he faced sharp questioning from Franken.

"You said the net result of the use of arbitration is better workplaces," Franken said, cutting off de Bernardo's response. "She was drugged, she was raped, she had to have reconstructive surgery. If that's a better workplace, what was the workplace like before?"


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, June 10

HUD Funds Flood Iowa

From Rebuild Iowa Office RIO:

Governor Chet Culver, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Congressman Dave Loebsack (IA-2) yesterday announced that Iowa will receive $516.7 million in funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for disaster recovery. This brings Iowa’s funding from HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to nearly $800 million to date. The funding will be administered by the state under an agreement to follow modified rules of the CDBG program, a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs such as home buyouts, public infrastructure projects, and assistance to businesses, economic revitalization and flood mitigation.

“Iowa has come so far in the past year – rebuilding piece by piece and block by block with every dollar of assistance that has come into our state. But there are still significant areas that still show signs of devastation and have a very damaged local economy,” said Senator Harkin. “You need only walk through downtown Cedar Rapids to see empty window fronts and padlocked doors that once represented a thriving economy. Iowa suffered one of the five largest natural disasters on record of any state, and we are far from full recovery. These funds will help in that effort.”

“Nearly one year after the floods of last summer devastated Iowa, we are still rebuilding. These funds will aid Iowa’s long term recovery and rebuilding efforts,” said Congressman Loebsack. “As our families struggle to move forward, it is essential that we distribute these funds to communities based on unmet and long term recovery needs. One of the communities that will benefit significantly from these funds is Linn County, whose citizens are still coping with severe damage to their homes, businesses, and infrastructure. Just days after the flood waters hit Iowa, the Iowa Delegation was fighting for Iowans. As we continue in our recovery efforts, I will continue to make sure that the voices of Eastern Iowa are heard in Washington.”

“We continue to make great progress with our recovery efforts in Iowa thanks to strong partnerships, not only between federal, state and local governments, but with thousands of Iowans who have hope and confidence in the communities they call home. This commitment by President Obama and Secretary Donovan means that, as of today, more than $3 billion in federal and state funds have been committed to rebuilding our great state after the historic floods and storms of 2008,” said Governor Culver. “This $517 million in additional CDBG funds will give Cedar Rapids and communities throughout the state more resources to rebuild from past disasters and help prevent future disasters. In the end, these funds allow us to keep rebuilding Iowa, even better and stronger than before.”

There is $6.1 billion for CDBG from the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance and Continuing Appropriations Act that passed on September 30, 2008. Today’s funding announcement allocates that funding. One third of it had been preliminarily allocated under a provision Senator Harkin wrote that required that a portion of the money would come to the states more quickly, to have the funds allocated within 60 days. But, the entire amount uses the formula that is being announced today.

Harkin, Loebsack and Culver have worked with Secretary Donovan as well as a number of members of the White House staff to have a formula that fairly allocated the funds among the states that suffered from 2008 disasters. A key part of that discussion was the need to properly consider the need to consider economic revitalization which is far more necessary in larger disasters, particularly those involving large cities.

The total federal assistance allocated to Iowa now is over $3 billion, approximately half of which has been administered through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA.)

Friday, April 3

Steve King and Tom Harkin: Strange Bedfellows

Clearly in the camp of not trusting the Iowa Constitution's equal protection clause, Iowa Rep. Steve King condemned the Iowa Supreme Court's Friday decision to lift a decade-long ban on same-sex marriage, saying it puts the state in danger of becoming a "gay marriage Mecca." While both insulting to Muslms and the GLBT community in making this bizarro comparison, he also insults the intelligence of many Iowans who do believe in equality.

"This is an unconstitutional ruling and another example of activist judges molding the Constitution to achieve their personal political ends," King said in statement. "Iowa law says that marriage is between one man and one woman."

Showing that bipartisanship can create strange bedfellows, Senator Tom Harkin with his disclaimer in making a statement about the Iowa high court's ruling strikes me as weak-kneed (though not as blatently dismissive of the court's ruling certainly as Rep. King). Said Sen. Harkin, “My personal view has been that marriage is between a man and a woman, and I have voted in support of that concept." It seems like an attempt to distance himself from a key group of his constituency at a time when he should be celebrating a win for their civil rights.

To his credit he does continue to say "I also fundamentally believe that same sex couples in a civil union should be entitled to all the basic legal protections and benefits of marriage. The Court found that it is necessary to afford same sex couples the ability to marry in order to allow them those legal protections and benefits. I will respect and support that decision and I hope that other Iowans can do the same." For a senator who has generally been supportive of justice and protection of rights, his equivocation does not sit well with me.

In any case, I'm sure many Iowans will support the conflicted views these elected officials hold. As Harkin himself said, "I know that this decision will be very hard for many to accept but I also know that it will provide many committed same sex couples and families important rights, as well as an important sense of recognition and belonging.” As for me, I am equally sure that many more folks here will live and let live--as this is first and foremost, the Iowa way.

Wednesday, November 5

Men's Club Continues: No Change in Iowa Delegation

As widely expected, all the Iowa Congressional seats remain in the hands of incumbents as Democrats Bruce Braley, Dave Loebsack, and Leonard Bowell, and Republicans Tom Latham, and Steve King handily won their district races. Also, Democrat Senator Tom Harkin dispensed unheralded Republican challenger Christopher Reed.

Iowa continues to be one of only two states that has never sent a qualified woman candidate of any party to Congress, as Marrianette Miller-Meeks, Wendy Barth, and Becky Greenwald were defeated.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, June 18

Harkin's Office Creates Handbook to Help Iowan Disaster Victims

U.S. Senator Tom Harkin today announced that his office has created a handbook that will assist Iowans who have been affected by the recent severe storms, tornadoes and flooding beginning May 25.

The handout is online athttp://harkin.senate.gov/documents/pdf/2008DisasterHandout.pdf

The handbook contains information regarding:
-- Registering with FEMA
-- Federal housing assistance
-- Long-term, low interest loans
-- State grants for those living in Governor declared disaster areas
-- Filing property damage claims with your insurance company

Iowans with additional questions are asked to call one of Harkin's local offices if they have any questions about disaster assistance.

Office hours are 8:00am to 5:00pm CST Monday through Friday
CEDAR RAPIDS
150 First Avenue, NE
Suite 370
Cedar Rapids, IA 52401
(319) 365-4504 Phone
(319) 365-4683 Fax

DAVENPORT
1606 Brady Street
Suite 323
Davenport, IA 52803
(563) 322-1338 Phone
(563) 322-0417 Fax

DES MOINES
210 Walnut Street
Room 733, Federal Building
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 284-4574 Phone
(515) 284-4937 Fax

DUBUQUE
350 W. 6th Street
315 Federal Building
Dubuque, IA 52001
(563) 582-2130 Phone
(563) 582-2342 Fax

SIOUX CITY
320 6th Street
110 Federal Building
Sioux City, IA 51101
(712) 252-1550 Phone
(712) 252-1638 Fax

Thursday, December 13

Life, Liberty, and Closed-Captioned Video

Tom Harkin is helping the disabled to keep up with politics.

From the Senator's Press Release:

As the author of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act that protects the civil rights of more than 54 million Americans with physical and mental disabilities, Senator Harkin has long been a champion of ensuring that all Americans have equal access and opportunities.

The recent CNN/YouTube debates have shown that the Internet and online video are rapidly becoming a mainstream medium for direct engagement in our democracy. With the advent of these new technologies and mediums it is important that we continue to ensure that every American has the opportunity to participate. That's why all of us at
TomHarkin.com are proud to announce our new service to provide closed-captioning of our online campaign videos.

Please click here to visit
www.tomharkin.com/closed-captioned-video and view our new closed-captioned video section.

To provide the closed captioning of our online video we have partnered with Project readOn , the web's leading and most innovative closed-captioning service. Project readOn works toward making online media content available to all by giving users the power to decide exactly what videos they want captioned, and giving webmasters an innovative and easy-to-use caption player that is easy to install on any website.

Project readOn also has also has close-captioned videos from people like this guy.

Friday, November 16

What's Up With the Farm Bill, Tom?

Tom Harkin speaks:

As Chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, I was very pleased when my colleagues and I unanimously passed the 2007 farm bill out of committee last month. Our bill - The Food and Energy Security Act - is a forward-looking, fiscally responsible measure that provides new investments in conservation, renewable energy, nutrition assistance and rural development.

While our bipartisan bill passed the committee on a voice vote without a negative vote voiced, it is now stuck at a standstill. Unfortunately, so far, leadership of the minority party in the Senate has been unwilling to work with us to limit the number of non-relevant amendments so that we can pass this bill to move rural America forward.

This bill improves farm income protection and promotes new income opportunities for farm and ranch families – such as in farm-based renewable energy, along with more help to dairy farmers and particularly to specialty crop producers. It boosts economic growth, jobs and the quality of life in our rural communities. It has excellent new initiatives to help restore our national energy security by promoting biofuels and other renewable energy sources and rural energy initiatives. It makes major new investments in helping farmers and ranchers conserve and enhance the resources on their land – to save soil, increase water quality, conserve wetlands and restore wildlife habitat. It will allow low-income Americans to put more food on the family table, and it will help improve the diets and health of kids by providing access to more fruits and vegetables in our schools.

Regrettably, through vetoes and veto threats, the president seems to be setting up a procedural and budgetary train wreck at the end of this session of Congress that threatens legislation that is in the best interests of our country. Our new farm bill must be spared this fate. Be assured that I will continue my fight to get this strong, bipartisan farm bill through the Senate and enacted into law.

Friday, September 28

Response From Sen. Harkin on Farm Bill

Thank you for contacting me.

I am always glad to hear from you. I appreciate hearing your support for Bread for the World's farm bill proposal. As you may know, Rev. David Beckmann, President of Bread for the World, testified in front of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Nutrition on April 25. He offered his thoughts on how to improve farm policy to help the poor and hungry here in the United States and around the world.

Along with an effective safety net for farmers to alleviate their risks, I intend to provide farm programs that strongly support conservation, rural economic development, farm-based renewable energy and bio-based products to provide broad, long-term benefits to our environment, our economy and our rural communities all across America. I believe our farm programs must differentiate between those who most need federal assistance and those who are better positioned to manage economic risk.

I share the concerns of many Iowans about excessive farm payments to the largest farm operations and the impact this skewed distribution has on the ability of smaller farm operations to compete. I believe there should be a much stronger focus in farm programs on promoting opportunities for family-sized operations. As I draft the upcoming farm bill, I will work hard to include meaningful payment limitations and farm programs that provide the loans, financial assistance and safety nets programs to support the farms and families that need it most. I also appreciate hearing your thoughts on farm program payments. I share your concerns about the effect that excessive farm program payments to the largest farm operations have on the ability of smaller farm operations to compete.

A balanced farm income support policy should differentiate between those who most need federal assistance and those who are better positioned to manage economic risk. I believe there should be a much stronger focus in farm programs on promoting opportunities for family-sized operations. In addition, agricultural programs supporting conservation, rural economic development, farm based renewable energy and bio-based products will provide broader, long-term benefits to the smaller farms and communities in rural America.

While I fought for stricter payment limitations in the 2002 farm bill, the final bill did not go as far as I would have preferred. As I draft the upcoming farm bill, I will work hard to include meaningful payment limitations and farm programs that provide the loans, financial assistance and safety nets programs to support the farms and families that need it most. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts on the upcoming farm bill. Please rest assured that I will consider your thoughts and concerns as my staff and I continue work on the 2007 farm bill.

Sincerely, Tom Harkin

Thursday, September 27

Harkin Pastes Pace For Propaganda



Sen. Harkin does a good job of laying out Gen. Pace for his his view that gay sex is immoral and should not be condoned by the military.

Wednesday, September 19

Harkin Steak Fry Video




If you, like me were unable to make the Indianola Express to the Harkin Steak Fry, here is an opportunity to watch it, thanks to Ryan Alexander.

Tuesday, September 11

Harkin's A Fry, Baby

Exerpted From Iowa Politics (www.iowapolitics.com):

This weekend six declared Democratic candidates -- Obama, Biden, Clinton, Dodd, Edwards and Richardson -- are set to join thousands of Iowans at the 30th anniversary of Harkin's trademark fundraiser. The event is set for 1 p.m. Sunday just east of Indianola.

"This will be a unique opportunity to see our candidates articulate their vision at one of Iowa's largest Democratic gatherings," Harkin said. "The Steak Fry has become my signature event of the year, and I look forward to celebrating 30 years of history and tradition."

When it comes to the Harkin event, presidential candidates and the top names in Democratic politics turn out to appear at the Warren County fundraiser. Leading up to the last presidential election more than 3,000 turned out for the 2003 steak fry, which featured former President Bill Clinton and a field of Democratic candidates that included Howard Dean, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Sen. John Kerry, Edwards and Carol Moseley-Braun.

General admission tickets for the steak fry are $30 apiece (students can get in for $15), while those wishing to give more can sign on as sponsors ($500) or hosts ($200). Harkin, who already had more than $2.6 million in the bank as of June 30, faces re-election in November 2008. Cedar Rapids businessman Steve Rathje, who is making his first Senate run, is seeking the Republican nomination.

Harkin has yet to endorse any presidential candidate, and it does not appear an endorsement is coming in the future either. "Unlike my wife, I have not made a decision to support, nor do I plan to endorse, any of the Democratic presidential candidates," Harkin said in his campaign blog. "I have worked closely with many of them, and I am extremely proud of each of them for their commitment to public service. I remain focused on my own re-election campaign in 2008 and look forward to working with a Democrat in the White House."

Thursday, September 6

Suicide Is Not Painless: Helping the Veterans

The VA estimates that approximately 5000 Vets commit suicide each year and the suicide rate for Iraq Vets is 35% higher than the general population. Earlier this year, the House passed a bill introduced by Congressman Leonard Boswell and it passed with a vote of 423 to zero.

Senator Tom Harkin has introduced a bill in the Senate (Joshua Omvig Veterans Suicide Prevention Act) that is being held up by Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. Why? According to Harkin "Out of the blue, Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma objected to the unanimous consent request. And his principal reason for doing so is completely baseless. He speculates that if we have mandatory screening of all veterans for suicide risk, the resulting medical data might be used to deny a veteran the right to purchase handguns."

What's in the bill:

It empowers the VA to develop and carry out a comprehensive program designed to reduce the incidence of suicide among veterans. Requires the program to include: (1) mandatory training for appropriate staff and contractors of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) who interact with veterans; (2) screening for suicide risk factors veterans who receive medical care at a Department facility; (3) tracking of veterans; (4) referral of at-risk veterans for counseling and treatment; (5) designation of a suicide prevention counselor at each Department medical facility; (6) research on best practices for suicide prevention; (7) mental health care for veterans who have experienced sexual trauma while in military service; (8) 24-hour veterans' mental health care availability; (9) a toll-free hotline; (10) outreach and education for veterans and their families; and (11) peer support counseling.

Watch Sen. Harkin discuss this bill.

Tuesday, September 4

From Senator Tom Harkin: Close Gitmo

Dear Friend,

The successor to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will face a number of tough challenges, but none of them will be as critical as restoring our Constitution and the public's confidence and trust in the rule of law.

That is why I am calling on my colleagues in the Senate to only confirm a nominee for Attorney General who among other items, shows his or her commitment to upholding the rule of law and restoring fundamental rights and freedoms by supporting efforts to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

Click here to sign my petition to tell the Senate to only confirm a nominee for Attorney General who supports closing down the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay today.

By continuing to isolate detainees on Guantanamo Bay without bringing charges against them, we have forfeited our moral leadership and hindered our ability to rally support in our fight against terrorism. Closing this facility is our single best opportunity to rally our allies in a more effective fight against terrorism and to reduce the risk to Americans traveling abroad.

In May, I introduced legislation that would require President Bush to order the Department of Defense to close the prison at Guantanamo, to resolve the legal status of detainees, and to transfer those accused of a crime to maximum security prisons in the United States.

The chief responsibility of the Attorney General is to enforce the rule of law and uphold the Constitution of the United States. It is irreconcilable for any current or future holder of this office to both enforce the rule of law and to condone indefinite detention at Guantanamo Bay.
That's why I believe the next Attorney General must support efforts to close down the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay. And I call upon the Senate to only confirm a nominee for this position who will do so.

Please click here to sign my petition to only confirm a nominee who supports efforts to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

Thank you for your support.
Senator Tom Harkin

Wednesday, July 18

Tom Harkin's Statement Supporting Reed-Levin Amendment

Statement by Senator Tom HarkinOn the Levin-Reed Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act

July 16, 2007

Mr. President, it is time to chart a new course in Iraq, and to redirect our armed forces toward a more focused and effective campaign against the terrorists who threaten us. I am cosponsoring the Levin-Reed amendment because it offers the best prospect for accomplishing these goals.

For four long years, President Bush has said that as the Iraqis step up to their responsibilities, the United States will be able to step down. Today, it is painfully clear that the opposite is the case: The Iraqi military and government will only step up to their responsibilities once it is clear that the United States is stepping down.

Levin-Reed says that the U.S. will begin troop redeployment within 120 days and remove most American combat forces from Iraq by April of next year. This acknowledges what has long been obvious to our commanders: That there can be no military solution to the mess in Iraq. At the same time, by signaling our intention to redeploy by next spring, we will create powerful incentives to force compromise within the deadlocked Iraqi government, and to compel Iraq's neighbors to play a more active, constructive role in pacifying that country.

There is no guarantee that this approach will succeed. There is no guarantee that the Iraqis will be willing or able to compromise and come together in a genuine government of national reconciliation. The only certainty is that our current course is a formula for more failure, more deadlock within the Iraqi government, more death and destruction, both Iraqi and American.

Mr. President, new developments last week have driven home the urgency of the change of course proposed by this amendment.

Last week, we learned that we are now spending an astronomical $10 billion a month in Iraq. And, this morning, the administration issued the required progress report on benchmarks for Iraq. As expected the report shows that the government in Baghdad has failed to meet any of the benchmarks for political and economic reform. The Iraqis have failed to make progress in passing a law governing the sharing of oil revenues. They have failed to make progress in allowing former Baath party members to return to their jobs. They have failed to make progress in disarming militias. They have failed to make progress in organizing new provincial elections. Indeed, the only thing the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds in parliament can agree on is that will go on vacation for the month of August.

The one glimmer of good news in the report is that the U.S. military has had some success since January in improving the security situation, though overall levels of violence and mayhem are largely unchanged. This limited success should not come as a surprise to anyone. We all appreciate the professionalism, capability, and courage of our armed forces. And it would be astonishing if we deployed an additional 30,000 troops and didn't see at least some improvement in the security situation. Unfortunately, these modest gains are all being accomplished by U.S. troops, not Iraqi troops. And because the surge is not sustainable much beyond the end of the year, even these modest gains are ephemeral.

Meanwhile, a new report by the National Counterterrorism Center concludes that al-Qaeda has grown stronger than at any time since the 9/11 attacks, and is better positioned to strike the West. In other words, while the United States' military and intelligence assets have been massively sidetracked in Iraq over the last four years, al-Qaeda has been able to regroup elsewhere, mostly in Pakistan. As the CIA's deputy director for intelligence told a House committee on Wednesday: "We see more [al-Qaeda] training. We see more money. We see more communication."

Indeed, the U.S. invasion of Iraq has been the gift that keeps of giving to al-Qaeda. There was no al-Qaeda presence in Iraq before the invasion. Now, a homegrown organization loosely affiliated with al-Qaeda — al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia — has emerged.

What's more, as previous intelligence reports have concluded, America's ongoing occupation of Iraq has been a powerful recruitment tool not only for al-Qaeda but for many new Islamic extremist organizations, some of them sprouting up spontaneously in western countries including Britain and Spain.

So, Mr. President, we have reached an extraordinary juncture with regard to the current failed policy in Iraq. We have reached the point, frankly, where you either side with the President and his demand that we stay the course in pursuit of what he calls "victory," or you side with the American people and our military commanders, who have concluded that there is no military solution to the mess in Iraq.

You either support this endless, pointless war, or you support a smarter, more focused campaign against the terrorists who truly threaten us.

Those are the choices in the current Senate debate. The Democrats and the American people have made their choice — to chart a new direction. I am confident that, as more Republicans make that same choice in the days and weeks ahead, we will ultimately prevail.

The conflict in Iraq can only be solved through political compromise and reconciliation in Baghdad, and through aggressive diplomatic engagement with Iraq's neighbors and across the Middle East.

It is time to chart a new course. The approach embodied in the Levin-Reed amendment offers us our best hope for extricating ourselves from the quagmire in Iraq, and retaking the offensive against al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. I urge my colleagues to support the Levin-Reed amendment.

Tuesday, July 10

It's Alive 2!

Tom Harkin has a new campaign site up on the web. Go see what our junior Senator is up to these days. Senator Tom, if you are checking in--Why is Ruth supporting Hillary?

Friday, June 29

Friday Quick Hits

Five U.S. soldiers were killed when a "very large" roadside bomb exploded near their combat patrol in southern Baghdad, a U.S. general said Friday.

A combination of small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades followed the blast Thursday, said Army Maj. Gen. Joseph F. Fil Jr., who described the attack as "showing a level of sophistication that we have not often seen so far" during the period of the so-called "surge" in U.S. forces.

Fil said four soldiers were killed initially. Seven others were wounded, he said, and one of those later died.


The New York Times has a new poll out. Here's a clue, it wouldn't be in this blog if it wasn't saying something I would not agree with.

What Women See in Hillary (or not)
from the Nation via Zogby

"I love [Hillary Clinton] so completely that, honestly, she would have to burn down the White House before I would say anything bad about her!" exclaimed Nora Ephron in a 1993 Newsday interview. Three years later, she told the Wellesley class of 1996, "Understand: Every attack on Hillary Clinton for not knowing her place is an attack on you." Come late 2006, however, Ephron was the one on the attack as one of the self-described "Hillary resisters" -- those who believe that "she will do anything to win, who believe she doesn't really take a position unless it's completely safe," as she wrote on her Huffington Post blog, "who believe she has taken the concept of triangulation and pushed it to a geometric level never achieved by anyone including her own husband, who can't stand her position on the war, who don't trust her as far as you can spit."

Hey Guantanamo Detainees, The Court's in Your Favor
The Supreme Court said today that it would review the rights of Guantanamo Bay detainees to challenge their confinements in federal court, reversing a decision in April not to take up that issue.

A Syria-ous Charge
President George W. Bush on Friday banned Syrian and Lebanese officials whom Washington accuses of undermining the Lebanese government from entering the United States, the White House said.

Free Air Better Than Fair Air?
The House voted Thursday to bar the Federal Communications Commission from reinstating the broadcast “fairness doctrine” even though there are no legislative or regulatory proposals to bring back the rule. The bill which was adopted, 309-115, puts the House on record as favoring “freedom on the public airwaves.” This is great news for Rush, Sean, Ann, and less good news for equal press. With consolidation of the airwaves, this points to the need for community radio.

Veggie Booty Might Make You a Sicko
Food poisoning isn't progressive so be aware a recall is underway for snack food Veggie Booty which may have a type of salmonella in it.

Bush "Putin" on the Ritz in Kennebunkport This Weekend For Russian Leader
Caviar from the Caspian Sea will be flown in to the land of lobster as what might be the final meeting between Presidents Bush and Vladimir Putin gets underway in Kennebunkport, Maine.

Dems Challenge Invocation of Executive Privilege
In a letter to White House counsel Fred Fielding, the heads of the Senate and House Judiciary committees demanded an explanation in 10 days of why the White House claimed executive privilege on subpoenaed documents and vowed to invoke "the full force of law."

Homeland's Chertoff: He Don't Like, He Don't Like, He Don't Like--Propane
A long way to go for a pun, but Charles Grassley and Tom Harkin saw problems with new propane regulations proposed by the Department of Homeland Security. The proposal would list propane as a chemical of interest when kept in quantities greater than 7,500 pounds, forcing a costly risk assessment.

Monday, June 18

Wedge Issue 2007: Immigration

In 2004, the Iraq War was the wedge issue used to scare voters into re-electing president Bush--if you aren't supporting the war, you are helping the terrorists was the battle sound bite (and may the deity or non-deity of your choice help you, if you "flip-flopped").

Fast forward to 2007 and it is those darn illegal immigrants that we have to watch out for. First of all, they are all terrorists--otherwise why else would they sneak in to our country? We must erect a wall to keep them out--it worked in Berlin didn't it?

If you are in the labor movement, they are taking your high paying American jobs (particularly the one's where you shoot nails into the heads of cattle to kill them and/or clean their guts off the rendering floor). Worse than that, they are keeping you from unionizing more folks--what with their willingness to work for less than you--and off the books too!

If you are a conservative, well of course "those people" are wasting your tax money which the government ought not have in the first place, screwing up the schools for your kids--so much so, that you are homeschooling them or sending them to St. Somebody for a decent education, and making your health care costs sky-rocket, what with all the free medical care they are scarfing down.

Add to that they don't all speak, read, or write in English! As a person whose relatives came to the US speaking Russian, Slavic tongues, and German, I know that language acquisition takes time, but people do learn the language (free market economics tells you why--to better yourself and have more options). Yes it is scary when people speak a different language (particularly when you are sure they talking about you)

Supposedly there are over 12 million of those rascals running around our fair nation-- that's 4.1% of the population (using 2005 census figures), roughly the same as the number of people in the US over the age of 83 (and don't get me started on those freeloading octogenarians).

Think of all the damage those people are doing to our country. They are artificially keeping the price of our food supply down by working for lower wages than 99% of Americans are willing to work for. They are doing the kinds of work that are considered highly dangerous by OSHA, the kinds of work that a considered menial by us long-timers, and the kinds of work which allow the rest of us to go to work while our children, parents, mentally ill and physically sick are cared for. They are overpaying for poor quality housing, medical, and basic services, not able to report abuses by those who profiteer from their presence.

So it makes all the sense in the world to round them up and, at the very least, make them pay our government for the privilege of serving us, allow them to work here without hope for citizenship or rights (except if they are willing to serve in our military), and send them packing at the whim of our corporations or political breeze.

This is where I get on my high horse...give me a second. Okay, there.

We love to forget that we are an immigrant nation. We love to forget that many of the comforts we enjoy today were due to the industriousness of those who came here seeking the freedoms we enjoy. We love to forget we displaced a native population to have what we have. What we don't love to admit is that "different" scares many of us. We hate to admit we are enamored with "cheap" over "fair"--we love a bargain and illegal immigrants are a price we willingly pay.

Because we also love the ideals of our democracy, these workers serve to remind us that we aren't living up to them. As a result of our tortured national psyche, most of us can't decide what to do and so we either turn a blind eye or act with vigilante justice.

So as both sides exploit our fears and hopes, let it be you that decides if immigration policy is a your issue.

As for me, I say "bring me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." If the free market economy does anything, it will tell folks when it is not worth their effort to come. And, not for nothing, I actually like what our Senator Tom Harkin says on dealing with the realities of this subject.

Tuesday, June 12

Harkin "Close Guantanamo"

Shut Down Guantánamo / Disengage the Military Commissions Act

May saw two new bills introduced that would make it mandatory to shut down the detention center at Guantánamo Bay. Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) introduced S 1469 and Representative Jane Harman (D-CA-36-Venice) introduced HR 2212.
The emergence of so many bills on these issues is another indication that many people across the United States realize that torture, rendition, Guantánamo, and the guise of Military Commissions really hurt us, not only in the eyes of the world, but in our own sense of who we are as a nation.

Add another bill to the list of those created to dismantle the Military Commissions Act: On May 24, Representative Loretta Sanchez (D-CA-47) introduced HR 2543, a bill that revises the definition of unlawful enemy combatant and establishes a statutory right of habeas corpus for those held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Each of these bills deserves a good deal of scrutiny. If you look at the BORDC legislation page, you'll see that there are several pieces of legislation addressing each of these issues already. Choosing the specific cargo for each of these bills, or choosing a bill already equipped with the necessary cargo to move towards justice is a challenge for us all. This is required reading prior to June 26, when the whole country will be ablaze in discussion on how the United States should proceed in these delicate life and death choices.

Friday, May 18

Peace is Every Step

If Politicians were really serious about ending the war, wouldn't they rescind the authority to the president for the War? It seems the movement toward ending the war is predicated more on the 2008 election result than bringing the troops home NOW. It is up to us, the public, to challenge that notion. So what can be done?

- Protest every Friday afternoon at 5:15 at the corner of Washington and Clinton Streets

- Bombard Congressman Loebsack's office with mail and/or set up a meeting through his staff to discuss ending the war with the Congressman, Senator Harkin and Senator Grassley's office (although drop-ins are always welcome--until 5 pm--ask the CR 11).

- Sign every petition that is sent your way that is intended to stop the war.

- Support the families who have sons and daughters in the conflict.

- Show up at Memorial Day events.

- Boycott companies that profit from the war. This includes stocks and mutual fund holders. A short list is below: Check out War Profiteers for more or here.

Boeing

Lockheed Martin

Northrop Grumman

General Dynamics

Raytheon

United Technologies

Halliburton

General Electric

Science Applications International Corporation

- Join with other people to resist the next one.

- Be persistent, be consistent, and don't take "no" for an answer.

- Add your own ideas.