Web Scum?

Who is running this one? The site points out information about Barack Obama that is mostly patently false and yet The Cedar Rapids Gazette has accepted it on their online website as paid advertising. There is not any information about the "political advertisers" who paid to run it, just a street address and phone number in Houston, TX.



A "politcal advertisement" site run by CompuEdge 2828 Rogerdale Rd., Houston, TX 77042 • (713) 549-5510, politics@compuedge.net

FISA As a Wedge Issue

In order to attack Democrats in weak Congressional districts, it appears that Republican operatives are using the House's refusal to vote on the FISA bill as a wedge issue based accusing these Dems as being weak on protecting Americans from terrorists.

Truthout Reports:

An aggressive campaign by the White House and its allies to win approval of
a new electronic spying bill is escalating partisan tensions on Capitol Hill.
The contentious debate over the measure could spill over into this fall's
election campaign.

The latest tactic employed by administration
supporters involves a $2 million television advertising campaign featuring
sinister images of Osama bin Laden that started running this week in the home
districts of about 15 Democratic members of Congress who are potentially
vulnerable this fall. The ads, funded by a newly formed conservative advocacy
group called defenseofdemocracies.org, charge that House Democrats have allowed
"surveillance against terrorists" to be "crippled" because they failed to
approve a version of the spying bill supported by the Bush administration.

The group, run by Clifford May, a former
communications director of the Republican National Committee, has not disclosed
the names of its donors. May told NEWSWEEK that he launched the campaign for the
express purpose of ratcheting up pressure on House Democrats. (The ads call on
voters to contact specific Democratic members and demand that they vote "to keep
us all safe.") "I think it's important for Democrats to hear from their
constituents on this issue," May said. "This is a national security
issue."

Democrats complain that the administration is
trying to politicize the electronic surveillance issue and use it for partisan
advantage this fall. "If you look at these ads, they are not too different from
the ads they ran against Max Cleland in 2002," said Meredith Salsbery, press
secretary to Minnesota Democratic Rep. Tim Walz, whose district has been
targeted in the advertising campaign. (Those notorious ads impugned the
patriotism and national security credentials of the Democratic senator from
Georgia, a Vietnam veteran and triple amputee who wound up losing his
re-election bid.) "To a lot of our constituents, these ads look like
fear-mongering and scare tactics designed to persuade the public that the
Democrats are soft on national security." More

Health Care: The Issue for 2008

American workers are by in large less entrepreneurial than other western countries and one reason may be health care costs.

In 2006, employer health insurance premiums increased by 7.7 percent – two times the rate of inflation. According to the National Coalition on Health Care, the annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $11,500. The annual premium for single coverage averaged over $4,200.

Imagine trying to afford to run a $100,000 business where, if you had a family of four, no less than 11.5% of your gross income would need to be set aside for insuring your family's health.

I believe the wedge issue for the Democrats will be Health Care simply because the Republicans 1) Don't have plans that are workable: Health Savings Accounts, are fine if you are in the top 35% of income earners, but for most people, they are undoable (you can't save money you haven't got). 2) defy their base to discuss anything but "free market" solutions.

The middle of America is ready for universal health care, the Republicans and the health care lobby will use considerable resources to tell us we are giving in to the "nanny state" to get it. But when you consider that our elderly, and our uninsured young get better care than most of us, I think we are foolish to keep doing what has largely been to our nation's detriment.